Senator Ed Schultz?

Senator Ed Schultz?

Senator Byron Dorgan’s decision to forego a 2010 reelection bid has sent Democrats in North Dakota — and Washington — searching for a candidate who can hold a blue seat in a red state.

And there is some interest in a potential contender who would bring a lot of star power to the race.

MSNBC host Ed Schultz, who worked his way onto the national stage from a place on the radio dial in Fargo, took calls Wednesday from Dorgan and top North Dakota Democrats who opened up a discussion about the prospect of a “Schultz for Senate” run.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Senator Byron Dorgan’s decision to forego a 2010 reelection bid has sent Democrats in North Dakota — and Washington — searching for a candidate who can hold a blue seat in a red state.

And there is some interest in a potential contender who would bring a lot of star power to the race.

MSNBC host Ed Schultz, who worked his way onto the national stage from a place on the radio dial in Fargo, took calls Wednesday from Dorgan and top North Dakota Democrats who opened up a discussion about the prospect of a “Schultz for Senate” run.

Schultz was intrigued yet reasonably resistant to the idea.

When we spoke in the afternoon, he was taking plenty of shots at the likely Republican Senate nominee, North Dakota Governor John Hoeven.

On his cable show Wednesday evening, however, the host sounded disinclined to leap onto the race.

“I’m in a different place than politics right now. We’re a long way from any consideration,” Schultz said in a special comment on MSNBC’s The ED Show. “And we’re a long way from any kind of decision.”

Noting that he had “invested a lot of time and a lot of years” in developing a popular syndicated radio show and, since April, his MSNBC program, Schultz said of the Senate race: “At this point, I’m not even considering.”

The fact is that Schultz, a quick-witted progressive populist who knows the issues and would be more than willing to go after Hoeven, has the makings of an appealing contender — despite the fact that he would have to establish himself as a “current resident” of the state where he made his name covering North Dakota State University sports teams.

Schultz would be a credible candidate and he could, undoubtedly, raise sufficient campaign funding to give Hoeven a run for his money.

He also has a compelling story. After all, another celebrity candidate started in radio, made a national name on TV and then got into politics, His name was Ronald Reagan.

But Schultz is not the only potential contender with appeal.

Two women are especially interesting prospects: former Attorney General Heidi Heitkamp, who was the Democratic-Non-Partisan League candidate for governor in 2000, and former Commissioner of Agriculture Sarah Vogel, who has been a great player on farm, food and trade issues for a quarter century.

Another potential contender with real appeal is State Senator April Fairfield, a former North Dakota Farmers Union staffer who has a record of winning a progressive Democrat is rural districts that tend to vote Republican in presidential elections. That’s a skill that should count for something with smart North Dakota and national Democrats in the turbulent year of 2010.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x