Secret Arrests Are an Odious Concept

Secret Arrests Are an Odious Concept

Following the September 11 attacks, the federal government rounded up more than 1,000 people and detained them without revealing their identities.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Following the September 11 attacks, the federal government rounded up more than 1,000 people and detained them without revealing their identities. Last October, The Nation joined the Center for National Security Studies, the American Civil Liberties Union and twenty other groups in submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the Justice Department asking for information regarding the detainees–including their identities, the reasons for their detentions, and the names of their lawyers. The Justice Department refused the request, and the petitioners (including The Nation) took the government to court. On August 2, federal district court Judge Gladys Kessler issued a decision ordering the government to turn over much of the requested information. In a strongly-worded opinion, she noted, “Secret arrests are ‘a concept odious to a democratic society’…and profoundly antithetical to the bedrock values that characterize a free and open one such as ours.”

The decision was a major loss for the Ashcroft Justice Department, which had argued that it needed to engage in secret detentions in order to prosecute its portion of the war on terrorism. The judge ordered the government to reveal the names within fifteen days. Presumably, the department will appeal the decision before then.

Kessler’s entire decision and order are here in PDF format. Adobe Acrobat required.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x