Recalling Santorum’s Opposition, America’s First Gay Ambassador Speaks Out

Recalling Santorum’s Opposition, America’s First Gay Ambassador Speaks Out

Recalling Santorum’s Opposition, America’s First Gay Ambassador Speaks Out

Santorum claims to support “equality of opportunity,” but he has repeatedly backed discrimination against gays in government.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

At this weekend’s GOP debates, former Senator Rick Santorum faced renewed questions about his record on gay rights, which he parried by stressing his opposition to anti-gay discrimination and support for “equality of opportunity.” During his tenure in Congress, however, Santorum took actions that enabled and even encouraged discrimination based on sexual orientation.

One of the most blatant examples was Santorum’s opposition to the nomination of James Hormel to be the first openly gay US ambassador. Santorum joined a campaign against Hormel’s nomination that frequently focused on his sexual orientation. Sending a gay American to be the ambassador to a Roman Catholic country, Santorum said in 1994, was “a complete insult to Catholics.” That was a stretch on several levels.

In a new interview with The Nation, Hormel emphasized that “no ambassador nomination takes place without approval of the other country”—a fact that is well known to members of Congress. Luxembourg had already approved the nomination, Hormel recalled, and that history “says something about the integrity of candidate Santorum—he claims to respect gay people, but I don’t find it credible.”

Asked if Santorum opposed his nomination based on his sexual orientation, Hormel saw no other interpretation. “He said it,” Hormel replied, “there’s no other conclusion that can be drawn.”

While that fight suggested Santorum’s views in a single case, at the level of federal policy, he also fought efforts to stop anti-gay discrimination across the country.

In 1996, Santorum voted against a bill to bar workplace discrimination against gays. That legislation, the Employee Nondiscrimination Act (ENDA), failed by a vote of 49 to 50. Today, twenty-one states have such a law on the books, so without a federal law, it is still generally legal in the other twenty-nine states to fire someone for being gay.

The Human Rights Campaign, a leading gay equality group, seized on that contrast after Sunday’s debate. Santorum claims to oppose discrimination, said HRC director Joe Solomnese, yet he opposes “laws that would make it illegal to fire LGBT people.” Solomnese saw the debate rhetoric as a reflection of the growing acceptance of homosexuality among the general public, while neither Santorum nor Romney have the record to match the moderate mood. “You can’t say one thing simply because it sounds good,” Solomnese said, “but yet continue to act in a manner that is completely at odds with that rhetoric.”

The ENDA bill never passed, but Hormel did go on to become the first openly gay US ambassador, once President Clinton nominated him with a recess appointment (another issue on today’s campaign trail). Now 79, Hormel is on a book tour for Fit to Serve, which narrates his “secret life” and “public battle to become the first openly gay U.S. ambassador.” Reflecting on the next steps for gay equality in the United States, Hormel cast the opponents of gay rights as wed to a false premise about the experience of being gay.

“I suspect many of these candidates are coming from the perspective that being gay is a choice,” he said. The “LGBT movement” will achieve its next breakthroughs, Hormel predicted, “when people realize being gay is not a choice.”

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x