Puzzle No. 1624

Puzzle No. 1624

From the March 20, 1976, issue. Be sure to vote in our contest to pick the new Nation puzzle­meister!

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email
ACROSS
 1 Not the sort of place to which some dissidents have been sent for “treatment,” but they might look for it. (9,6)
 9 Old political supporters might, but not directly. (9)
10 Ruined some of the ground I dug? (5)
11 Somehow the rent is put in here. (6)
12 Certainly not amateurish examinations, as people who make them might demonstrate… (8)
14 …and these might be pictured in the rosters of those who are paid for their effort. (8)
16 To call up is certainly all right, if it’s in the late afternoon. (5)
17 Eleven doesn’t have the right beginning to be treated as an 11. (5)
18 Essential being in a king or queen, for example, given a loving touch. (8)
20 An old-fashioned way to stop a case being confused in certain surroundings. (8)
21 A jumping Jack was told to be. (6)
24 Here in France it’s literally bad for coating, perhaps. (5)
25 Such would not imply a healthy selection, when one’s chill and upset. (3-6)
26 At Blackjack, deal another card with nine or ten to cover the main points. (3,3,4,5)
DOWN
  1 Such an address should imply a sound system for a lot of people. (6)
 2 Are they used to secure lots of hair? (5)
 3 Powerful barge mule, or whatever might be depended on. (5,2,8)
 4 Make better salt, perhaps. (4)
 5 Not the first thing to visit at the seaside, as a desperate measure. (4,6)
 6 Evidently not acquired by standing up for what you feel is due you. (9,6)
 7 The attractive part of classical Odes to Nero. (9)
 8 Times do change! (One who might make a habit of it?) (7)
13 As a forger, not so common nowadays. (10)
15 Holding back one form of transportation in the remainder? (9)
17 English town suggesting the cockney joint has the sound of change. (7)
19 Where love is found even in court proceedings. (6)
22 People who went to college, thus the deepest type! (5)
23 Strike lead, possibly… in the garden? (4)
From the March 20, 1976, issue. Be sure to vote in our contest to pick the new Nation puzzle­meister!
 

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x