Putin at the UN

Putin at the UN

Russian leader asks, will the US rethink its destructive, “revolutionary” role in the world?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussions of the new Cold War. This installment focuses on the speeches given at the UN by Presidents Obama and Putin on September 28 and on their private meeting. Cohen points out that the two speeches spelled out with considerable candor and clarity the very different and conflicting international thinking in Washington and Moscow. US policies in various parts of the world, from the Middle East to Ukraine, have been driven by a regime-change agenda in the name of democracy and a better life for those regions, a perspective reiterated in Obama’s speech. Putin replied that those US policies have resulted only in greater tyranny and more human misery, as evidenced by the march of ISIS through Iraq and Syria. Cohen asks, can Washington rethink its policies and can Russia ever be right?

If so, this may be the moment for such rethinking in Washington. Obama’s decision to meet privately with Putin was tacit admission that two of the White House’s major foreign policies have failed: the attempt to stop ISIS through a US-led military campaign; and the even longer policy of “isolating Putin’s Russia.” Various related issues are also discussed in this installment, including Putin’s proposal for a US-Russian “coalition” against ISIS akin to the US-Soviet alliance against Hitler’s Germany in World War II.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x