President Obama Can Help Prevent Torture From Making a Comeback

President Obama Can Help Prevent Torture From Making a Comeback

President Obama Can Help Prevent Torture From Making a Comeback

We need to know the whole truth about the Bush administration’s torture program.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

There are two critical matters that President Barack Obama must confront before leaving office: preventing the reappearance of a US-government torture regime and warding off any future FBI interference with elections.

Donald Trump, the president-elect, has repeatedly expressed an appalling enthusiasm for “waterboarding and even worse.” The fact that torture is a federal crime under the US anti-torture statute seems to have made no impression on him, possibly because no high-level official responsible for torture, such as former president George W. Bush, vice-president Dick Cheney, and CIA director George Tenet, has ever been investigated, much less prosecuted for it. Ironically, the Obama administration policy of looking forward, not back, may have created a sense of impunity for torture that will catapult us backwards into another torture regime.

If we can’t have accountability, then at least we can know the whole truth about the Bush administration’s torture regime so that we can fashion remedies to prevent its recurrence. President Obama can help on this score by ensuring that critical documents dealing with torture program are preserved and ultimately made public.  

The most important of these documents is the comprehensive report on the CIA’s torture program written by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. While a 500-page summary of the report was declassified (for the most part) and publicly released in 2014, the full 6,700-page report remains under wraps.

It is imperative to declassify and release the report because it strongly debunks the claims still made by the torture program’s defenders that it produced vital intelligence. The full report would also help the American people understand the horrors of the program, its gratuitous violence and its depravity. These two factors should help discourage its use again.

President Obama should try to declassify and release it, a step called for by Senator Dianne Feinstein, who chaired the Senate Intelligence Committee when the report was completed, as well as other committee senators.

Unfortunately, there might not be enough time to accomplish this before President Obama leaves office.

In the absence of public release, there is a serious danger that all copies of the full report could be returned to the Senate where they might never see the light of day. The Republican chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who strongly opposes the report, has called for a return of all copies previously delivered to several federal agencies and the president.

One approach to preserving and releasing the torture report is to try to obtain it under the Freedom of Information Act. The American Civil Liberties Union has sued—unsuccessfully so far—but the Justice Department has fought its release, arguing that it is a congressional document not subject to the Act. Justice’s position is flat-out wrong, and President Obama should make it clear that he favors the release of the report under FOIA.

A second approach is to have the full report deemed a presidential record, which, under the Presidential Records Act, would require its preservation by the National Archives. According to Professor Douglas Cox of CUNY School of Law, an expert on federal records, the report is already a presidential record, although to avoid any doubt in the event the Senate Intelligence Committee chair still seeks its return, the president should make a copy of the report and deliver both the original and the copy to the National Archives. I would add that the president should require his staff to look at some pages of the report to enhance its status as a presidential record. These actions would at least ensure the preservation of the report, and allow for its later public release.

President Obama should also declassify and release of other documents relating to the US torture regime, including the assistance given by other countries as well as US efforts to block other countries from holding US torturers accountable. The details of torture inflicted on any Guantánamo detainee should also be fully declassified, and any secret Office of Legal Counsel memos that authorize torture should be withdrawn and disclosed, thus removing any remaining legal authority for a new torture regime.

President Obama’s spokesperson recently touted the president’s work in ending torture. That vital legacy can be undone unless the whole record of the Bush administration’s torture regime is known, allowing appropriate lessons to be learned and preventive measures taken.

Another critical step that President Obama should take is to see to it that an investigation of FBI Director Jim Comey’s actions prior to the November 8 election be commenced immediately. The FBI must be kept from interfering again in a presidential election.

Although we may never know whether Director Comey’s announcement that he was examining a newly found trove of e-mails eleven days before the election actually caused the defeat of former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Clinton campaign certainly believes that it did. Director Comey’s actions defied longstanding Justice Department policy. And his justification—that he had earlier promised Congress to look at new information relating to the secretary’s e-mails —did not explain his need to initiate his “look” so close to the election or why he made that “look” public.

Furthermore, reports surfaced in the media that FBI agents in the New York office leaked information about the new e-mail trove to the Trump campaign and possibly to others. Rudy Giuliani, a former US Attorney and top Trump adviser, predicted an October surprise, but when Director Comey announced his probe, Giuliani quickly backtracked.

It is intolerable for a federal police force to try to affect a presidential election. Finding out what happened and why may help ensure that this kind of action will never be repeated.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x