One if by Misstatement, Two if by Ignorant: Palin Gets an ‘F’ in American History

One if by Misstatement, Two if by Ignorant: Palin Gets an ‘F’ in American History

One if by Misstatement, Two if by Ignorant: Palin Gets an ‘F’ in American History

She’s got Paul Revere riding on the wrong side of the Revolution.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Why is Sarah Palin touring American historical sites?
 
Apparently because she has decided to try and learn some basic details of the country’s founding story.
 
Unfortunately, the endeavor is not going well.
 
Even with conservatives cutting education budgets, every schoolchild who has paid even scant attention in history class knows that the midnight message of Paul Revere was a warning to the rebels of what would become the United States that the British Redcoats were on the march to disarm the dissenters.

But that was news to Palin.

When she got to Boston, with the apparent purpose of recalling Revere’s ride via a visit to the Old North Church, the former governor of Alaska started talking about “he who warned, uh, the British that they weren’t going to be taking away our arms uh by ringing those bells and making sure as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure and we were going to be free and we were going to be armed.”

Ouch.

It is tiresome to pick on Palin. She has taken more than her share of hits on matters of geography, newspaper reading, American allies and favorite founders. Even conservatives ridicule her—it was Glenn Beck who pressed her on the favorite founder issue.

There is little point to piling on after Beck has taken his shot.

Palin is not going to run for president because (as the polling makes abundantly clear) Republicans do not want her to be their candidate, because (as the polling makes even more abundantly clear) Americans would never elect her and because she is not about to give up her lucrative book, broadcasting and speaking fees to go back into public service.

It has ever been the case that Palin’s patriotism extends only so far as it benefits her own self-interest.

What is now equally evident, however, is that her historical bumbling is not a misstep here, a misstatement there. It is a pattern, a pattern of disconnection with and disinterest in the American story. Like so many politicians, she uses American history as a prop, not as inspiration, and certainly not as instruction.

Thank you for reading The Nation

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Ad Policy
x