November 30, 1999: World Trade Organization Meeting in Seattle Disrupted By Anti-Globalization Protests

November 30, 1999: World Trade Organization Meeting in Seattle Disrupted By Anti-Globalization Protests

November 30, 1999: World Trade Organization Meeting in Seattle Disrupted By Anti-Globalization Protests

“The scenes from Seattle are something not seen since the sixties, but in their totality unimaginable even then.”

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Before the World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle on this day in 1999, The Nation had devoted its entire issue to what its cover called the impending “Battle in Seattle.” In the issue following the confrontation between protesters and the police, the magazine published an editorial heralding the new era of people power:

After the Battle in Seattle one thing is certain: The next WTO confab will be held somewhere like Singapore or Jakarta. The corporate-dominated trade regimen enforced by the WTO is generating so much opposition that it can meet only under the sort of armed protection provided by a militarized state. Indeed, one silver lining of corporate-managed globalization is that it has harmonized US domestic protest against it to unprecedented levels of European-style militancy. Bill Clinton planned his appearance before the WTO as a showcase for successful free-trade policies, but he would up having to give his speech under the umbrella of a declared state of emergency bolstered by barricades, curfews, riot police and National Guard troops. The media focus on a few broken store windows should not distract from the profundity of what has happened here. A phatasmagorical mix of tens of thousands of peaceful demonstrators—husky, red-jacketed steelworkers marching alongside costumed sea turtle impersonators, environmentalists with miners, human rights activists with small family farmers—stood against the WTO, succeeded in closing down its opening sessinos and thrust the once-obscure issue of fair trade onto center stage….

The scenes from Seattle are something not seen since the sixties, but in their totality unimaginable even then.

November 30, 1999

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x