States sound off for instant runoff voting; activists unite for the International Day of Climate Action; and we remember an American radical who fought the “good fight” against fascism in Spain.



The bitter experience of the contested 2000 and 2004 presidential elections, and more than a few conflicted results on lower ballot lines, made most progressives passionate supporters of election reform. The Democratic victories of 2006 and 2008 tempered the passions. But FairVote’s

Rob Richie

reminds us that the way we vote remains “highly problematic, with straightforward problems.”

The problems have been on display this fall. In Albuquerque’s early October mayoral election, a pair of Latino Democrats split 6 percent of the vote, allowing a white Republican to “win” with 44 percent. “In a traditional runoff or an instant runoff, the Republican almost certainly would have lost,” notes Richie. The November 3 New Jersey gubernatorial election could produce a similar result, with an independent candidate attracting enough support to deprive the winner of a majority. Then there is the case of the exceptionally low-turnout New York City municipal primary runoff in September, which saw candidates for top jobs in the largest US city nominated with support from less than 2 percent of its eligible voters.

Calls for reform are being sounded in New Mexico, New York and New Jersey, as editorial writers and reformers are embracing proposals for instant runoff voting. Under IRV, voters rank candidates; if no one secures a majority, the candidate with the fewest number of first-preference rankings is eliminated and his or her votes are redistributed until a majority winner is identified. San Francisco and Burlington, Vermont, already have IRV systems; Minneapolis joins them this fall. If voters in St. Paul and Lowell, Massachusetts, back IRV referendums in November, those cities will implement similar systems. Minnesota State Senator

Mee Moua

, one of the first members of the Hmong community elected to office in the United States and a big backer of IRV in St. Paul, notes the reform’s potential to expand turnout, empower minorities and foster majority rule. “The effects of IRV are huge, and I believe it is one of the best changes in our voting system since the Voting Rights Act of 1964.”   JOHN NICHOLS


A nascent international climate-justice movement gained significant momentum on October 24, when reportedly hundreds of thousands of people gathered in 181 countries, calling attention to the urgency of reducing the emissions that are causing global warming. Organizers from

, which coordinated the

International Day of Climate Action

, are calling it the most widespread one-day political protest in history. More than 5,000 events occurred throughout the day on every continent, including Antarctica.

Author and co-founder

Bill McKibben

told The Nation: “350 ppm is what scientists say is the safest amount of carbon in the atmosphere for sustaining human existence. The odd thing about the day was that it was centered around an obscure data point–not around celebrities or politicians but around understanding the scientific significance of 350 and taking action.”

The protests occurred just forty-four days before representatives from 192 nations, various UN agencies and nongovernmental organizations will meet in Copenhagen to negotiate a climate agreement to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. Ninety-four countries, as well as the head of the UN’s

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

, have endorsed the goal of bringing atmospheric carbon levels down from their current level of nearly 390 ppm to 350 ppm. Yet the world’s greatest carbon emitters, like the United States and China, remain resistant to any binding cuts.

“Clearly Copenhagen is not going to produce an agreement that the science demands,” says McKibben. “But we need to make sure that we push the issue. We need to do movement-building.”   ROB ESHELMAN


Clarence Kailin

, who died on October 25 at 95 in his hometown of Madison, Wisconsin, was one of the last of the remarkable American radicals who fought “the good fight” against Spanish fascism as a member of the

Abraham Lincoln Brigade

. Kailin lived long enough to hear blowhards like

Sarah Palin


Glenn Beck

conflate socialism and fascism in their attacks on President Obama. Kailin, a lifelong socialist, recalled earlier this year, “I’m old enough to remember when Hitler, Mussolini and Franco were on the rise. When no one else would take on the fascists, when the conservatives were talking about what a great guy Franco was, we socialists went to Spain to try and stop him.”   JOHN NICHOLS

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy