Noted.

Noted.

The I-word, back on the table; Fannie Lou Hamer and the Democrats.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

THE ‘I-WORD’:

The revelations in Pulitzer Prize-winner

Ron Suskind

‘s book The Way of the World–that President Bush was informed in January 2003 that

Saddam Hussein

had no weapons of mass destruction, that the White House ordered the CIA to produce “evidence” of a nonexistent link between Hussein and Al Qaeda–merely confirm what was assumed for years: the President and Vice President were willing to go to any length to get their war on. But we ought not allow our cynicism about the Administration to obscure the fact that this book outlines “worse than Watergate” charges that demand Congressional action. The

House Judiciary Committee

is scheduled to “review” the allegations; the review can no longer dance around the “I-word.” If former CIA officials allege in taped interviews that a President or Vice President engaged in falsifying the “case” for war, a failure to impeach does not merely let the wrongdoers off the hook; it effectively places the executive beyond the reach of Congressional oversight or constitutional constraint. That, rather than any particular anger at Bush and Cheney, is why impeachment should be on the table.   JOHN NICHOLS

CONYERS’S COUP:

When Democrats convened in Denver 100 years ago, African-Americans urged nominee

William Jennings Bryan

to support a platform opposing lynching. Bryan declined, and the Colorado Statesman opined that it was “useless” to expect the party “to profess a sincere and wholesome regard for the welfare of the Negro citizen.” Another forty years would pass before Democrats finally endorsed a platform that moved the party “into the bright sunshine of human rights.” Even so,

Fannie Lou Hamer

‘s Mississippi Freedom Democrats struggled for seats at the 1964 convention. The Voting Rights Act and civil rights activism brought 337 African-American delegates and alternates to the 1968 convention with a young leader determined to make their voices heard. Congressman

John Conyers

co-chaired the party’s first “black caucus” and took the podium on behalf of

Channing Phillips

, the first African-American placed in nomination for the presidency. “We’re trying to act in a constructive sense to build a party to last, a party that will be relevant to a nation made up of many minorities,” he said. Conyers kept fighting: for serious treatment of

Shirley Chisholm

‘s 1972 run and for the Rev.

Jesse Jackson

‘s 1984 and 1988 campaigns, which he saw as revitalizing a party that had “become stale and lifeless.” He is similarly energized by

Barack Obama

‘s candidacy. “The excitement Obama has generated is tapping into a strong desire for change in America. And that change is happening in the Democratic Party,” argues Conyers, who comes to Denver not just to select the first African-American nominee but to continue forging a party relevant to a nation made up of many minorities. JOHN NICHOLS

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x