No Katrina Hearings? Gotcha, Joe

No Katrina Hearings? Gotcha, Joe

Senator Joseph Lieberman, chair of the Senate Homeland Security andGovernmental Affairs Committee, recently did a 180 and said thathe will not hold investigations into the disastrous Bush administration(non-)response to Hurricane Katrina. He said,”We don’t want to play ‘gotcha’ anymore” and that “looking back… wouldbe a waste of Congress’ time.”

In an attempt to explain the inexplicable Lieberman’s spokeswomanLeslie Philips offered this somewhat bizarre statement: “The senatorbelieves a more productive use of his time and that of his staff is to…ensure that a response to a future catastrophe is better.”

Huh? Isn’t that the whole point of examining the mistakes that weremade and why they occurred? To make sure that we get it right the nexttime?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Senator Joseph Lieberman, chair of the Senate Homeland Security andGovernmental Affairs Committee, recently did a 180 and said thathe will not hold investigations into the disastrous Bush administration(non-)response to Hurricane Katrina. He said,”We don’t want to play ‘gotcha’ anymore” and that “looking back… wouldbe a waste of Congress’ time.”

In an attempt to explain the inexplicable Lieberman’s spokeswomanLeslie Philips offered this somewhat bizarre statement: “The senatorbelieves a more productive use of his time and that of his staff is to…ensure that a response to a future catastrophe is better.”

Huh? Isn’t that the whole point of examining the mistakes that weremade and why they occurred? To make sure that we get it right the nexttime?

In fact, Phillips’ statement was reminiscent of something Liebermanwrote in May, 2006 in support of the very investigations he is nowdismissing: “Only through a thorough and comprehensive investigation ofwhat went wrong [can] we be assured that the government will know whatsteps are necessary to get it right the next time.” Lieberman also decried “a conscious strategy of slow-walking our investigation inthe hope that we would run out of time to follow the investigation’snatural progression to where it leads.” He accused the White House ofordering witnesses not to respond to questions, and the Departments ofJustice, Health and Human Services, and Homeland Security of failing tocooperate as well.

But Lieberman Version 2006 was on the verge of losing his party’snomination for Senate and was desperately treading water to save hispolitical life. Lieberman Version 2007, in contrast, owes his newpolitical life in part to George Bush who steered Republican supporthis way in the general election. It’s pay-back time.

Gotcha, Joe.

One hopes that others will pick up the ball dropped by the fecklessLieberman. Presidential candidate Barack Obama is a member ofLieberman’s committee. This is a clear opportunity for him to speakout in support of common sense and against the “smallness ofpolitics”–a centerpiece of his campaign.

In the House, Representative Henry Waxman chairs the Committee onOversight and Government Reform. (Waxman is also a member of theCongressional Progressive Caucus, whose members chair the majority ofcommittees and subcommittees and have generally committed to making New Orleans a priority.) He told me today, “Ihave a strong interest in the response to Hurricane Katrina, and it isunder consideration by the Committee.” But, according to Newsweek, Speaker Nancy Pelosi is “keep[ing] committees on a tight leash.”

Former FEMA Director Michael Brown says there was a video conference inthe White House Situation Room, in which he warned “senior officials”about the disastrous situation and was met with “deafening silence.” There are also believed to be records of conversations between Bush,Cheney, and aides as “the disaster was unfolding.”

Joe Lieberman Version 2006 had it right. Joe Version 2007 is smokingsomething. Who will step up to ensure that our government learns thelessons it needs to learn to strengthen the security of all Americans?

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x