Newsflash: Americans Still Oppose Iraq War

Newsflash: Americans Still Oppose Iraq War

Newsflash: Americans Still Oppose Iraq War

“The first thing we have to gauge is the reaction of the American people tonight and tomorrow,” Senator Jack Reed, the Democrats’ point person on the war in Iraq, said yesterday.

The reaction of the American people towards the war remains unchanged. They opposed it before Bush’s speech and they still oppose it after. Seventy percent of Americans now disagree with deploying more troops, according to an AP-Ipsos poll released this morning.

In a story today the New York Times gauged the reaction of voters in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, a traditionally Republican suburb outside of Philadelphia that voted for Democrat and Iraq war vet Patrick Murphy for Congress in ’06.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

“The first thing we have to gauge is the reaction of the American people tonight and tomorrow,” Senator Jack Reed, the Democrats’ point person on the war in Iraq, said yesterday.

The reaction of the American people towards the war remains unchanged. They opposed it before Bush’s speech and they still oppose it after. Seventy percent of Americans now disagree with deploying more troops, according to an AP-Ipsos poll released this morning.

In a story today the New York Times gauged the reaction of voters in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, a traditionally Republican suburb outside of Philadelphia that voted for Democrat and Iraq war vet Patrick Murphy for Congress in ’06.

A 64-year-old Republican barber and Vietnam vet says of President Bush: “The guy keeps digging us deeper and deeper into this mess, why not start pulling us out now?”

A Democrat whose son is stationed in Cyprus implores Congress to block Bush’s escalation. “It’s not too late for impeachment,” adds one of her house guests.

Sam Graham-Felsen and I visited Bucks County in the days before the election and filed this in-depth video report, “The ‘Burbs Go Blue.”

Republicans are currently disputing the notion that the midterm elections represented a referendum on Iraq. But when we asked voters in Bucks County, including many Republicans, what they wanted Democrats to do if elected, they repeated over and over, “They’ve got to get us out of Iraq.”

Sending more troops, it’s fair to say, was the last thing voters wanted.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x