Neo-McCarthyite Kremlin-Baiting of Trump Continues to Prevent Urgent Policy Debates

Neo-McCarthyite Kremlin-Baiting of Trump Continues to Prevent Urgent Policy Debates

Neo-McCarthyite Kremlin-Baiting of Trump Continues to Prevent Urgent Policy Debates

While pro-Clinton “liberals” and others escalate their slurring of Trump as Putin’s “agent” and “puppet,” international developments vital to US interests are being ignored in this presidential election year.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussions of the new US-Russian Cold War. (Previous installments are at TheNation.com.) After noting the mounting hysterical (and false) attacks on Trump as a candidate who as America’s president would willfully betray its national-security interests on behalf of Putin’s Russia, Cohen and Batchelor turn to the real issues that should be debated in the mainstream media and by the candidates themselves. Those issues include:

— Do Trump’s proposals for more cooperation and less conflict with Russia, in effect a new détente, have merit in the current conditions of an increasingly dangerous new Cold War?

— What are the implications for NATO if Turkey, a NATO member state, aligns itself more closely with Russia in the aftermath of the failed coup against Turkish President Erdogan, who met with Putin in Russia this week? Cohen points out that Erdogan seems to feel beholden to Putin for surviving the coup attempt and that major Russian financial incentives canceled after the Turkish shootdown of a Russian warplane several months ago—among them Turkey as a major site for Russian tourists and making Turkey a hub for Russian natural gas supplies to Europe—are already being restored. Cohen also asks whether or not this will alter Ergodan’s position regarding the war against ISIS and other jihadists in Syria, which had been at sharp odds with Putin’s position.

— Should Obama cooperate with Putin’s air war against ISIS and its jihadist allies in Syria as a breakthrough moment that may now be unfolding in the battle for Aleppo? Obama and Putin had reached a tentative agreement for such cooperation but it is being thwarted by opponents in Washington, particularly by Ash Carter’s Department of Defense, and by major segments of the mainstream media. Is demonizing Putin and thereby refusing a kind of mini-détente with Russia in this war against terrorism in America’s best interests? Cohen thinks it is, but he laments that this urgent issue is scarcely discussed in the establishment media or by the two major presidential candidates.

— Finally, and briefly, Cohen and Batchelor ask again if the banning of so many Russian athletes from the Rio Olympic Games is due to confirmed evidence of a massive Russian state-sponsored doping program or to the politics of the new Cold War. This issue will not end with the Games, as indicated by Cold War behavior by American and Russian athletes themselves.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x