Name Our Epoch!

Name Our Epoch!

What to call our current economic era? An all-star progressive panel of judges will pore over the entries and announce a winner.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Historians divide history into epochs. The Gilded Age and the Great Depression, for example, are familiar to most Americans. Our current epoch, however–a period that has seen soaring grand fortunes for a new American superrich and a fading American Dream for nearly everyone else–lacks a label. Some commentators have tried to supply one. Paul Krugman calls our past three decades of growing inequality the Great Divergence. Berkeley economist Harley Shaiken speaks about the Great Disconnect, his tag for years of stagnant and declining wages amid a growing economy.

Here at The Nation, we’d like to speed this naming process along. That’s why we’re joining the Institute for Policy Studies and announcing a fabulous new contest chock-full of redeeming social significance. We invite you to help us Name Our Epoch! Entering couldn’t be easier. Just send an e-mail to [email protected] with your suggested label for our excruciatingly unequal times. Put your thinking cap on now–we need your entry by July 4. Our all-star progressive panel of judges–historian Howard Zinn, journalist Barbara Ehrenreich and novelist Walter Mosley–will pore over the entries and announce a winner.

What’s in this for you if you win–besides the eternal gratitude of humankind? Win the Name Our Epoch sweepstakes and you’ll receive a private corporate jet! Can’t afford the rising cost of jet fuel? No problem–this jet’s a model. Need more incentive? Our contest winner will also receive personally autographed books written by each of our three distinguished judges.

So don’t delay. Our epoch desperately needs a label. After all, if we can’t name the misfortune that has been visited upon us, how are we ever going to end it?

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x