When The Denver Post’s editors revolted against “vulture-capitalist” ownership and suggested it might be time for their newspaper’s hedge-fund masters to sell the regional daily to someone—anyone—who cared about journalism, they did not propose a sweeping plan to address the crisis of democratic communications in America.

They simply said—as the paper’s current owners (Alden Global Capital) prepared to cut more jobs and further reduce the ability of an already downsized daily to cover a city, a region, and a state—that enough is enough.

“At The Denver Post on Monday, more than two dozen reporters, editors, photographers, videographers, page designers, digital producers and opinion staff will walk out the door. Our marching orders are to cut a full 30 by the start of July,” read the paper’s Sunday editorial. “These heartbreaking instructions raise the question: Does this cut, which follows so many in recent years that our ranks have shriveled from more than 250 to fewer than 100 today, represent the beginning of the end for the Voice of the Rocky Mountain Empire?”

It is not exactly “news” that a major daily newspaper faces the very real threat of being killed by profiteers who neither understand nor care about journalism. That’s a common story these days, in cities across the country. But it is newsworthy, and inspiring, when journalists rise to defend journalism.

The Post’s editors acknowledged they were late in speaking up. Vital newspapers have been dying for years nationally and in Colorado—where the great Rocky Mountain News ceased publication almost a decade ago.

The decline of daily newspapers has, too frequently and too casually, been blamed on “changing times”—the rise of digital communications, the movement of advertising to new platforms and new algorithms—but there was always more to the story than the technological or social disruptions of the era. Yes, the digital age has altered everything about our communications. And, yes, many once-great daily papers failed to adapt to the shifting media landscape. But a big part of the reason this adaptation has proven to be so difficult had been the scheming of profiteers to enhance their bottom lines by kicking journalism—and journalists—to the curb.

There were always bad owners of newspapers, radio stations, and television stations, just as there are now bad owners of online news sites. But the hedge funds that have in recent years been buying up major daily newspapers in order to capitalize on what remains of their reputations—or the downtown real estate where big-city newspapers were once headquartered—are not just bad owners. They are, indeed, vultures who pluck at the remains not just of media outlets but of a dying democratic discourse.

While responsible owners have been stabilizing—and in some cases growing—daily papers elsewhere, the union that represents journalists at the Post has argued for some time now that “Alden founders Heath Freeman and Randall Smith are dismantling the Post and other Digital First properties without conscience and with a disturbing lack of ethics.”

The Denver unit of the Newspaper Guild makes a good point. And this point is about much more than saving jobs at one newspaper in one city.

Americans have every good reason to worry about the challenges to democracy posed by fake news. But they need to understand that fake news thrives in the news deserts that remain where newspapers, radio stations, television stations, and online news sites are no longer sufficiently staffed to practice a journalism sufficient to check and balance the spin doctors, the liars, and the false prophets of a win-at-any-cost politics.

The Post’s editors recognized this in an editorial that admitted that they were sounding the alarm at a very late stage in the crisis. But they did do with an honest and necessary acknowledgement that too many waning news outlets fail to make: “When newsroom owners view profits as the only goal, quality, reliability and accountability suffer. Their very mission is compromised. The course correction that needs to come for the benefit of communities across the land depends on owners committed to serving their readers and viewers and users.”

They made that admission with an appropriate sense of urgency:

The cuts, backed by our owner, the New York City hedge fund Alden Global Capital, also are a mystery, if you look at them from the point of view of those of us intent on running a serious news operation befitting the city that bears our name. Media experts locally and nationally question why our future looks so bleak, as many newspapers still enjoy double-digit profits and our management reported solid profits as recently as last year.

We call for action. Consider this editorial and this Sunday’s Perspective offerings a plea to Alden—owner of Digital First Media, one of the largest newspaper chains in the country—to rethink its business strategy across all its newspaper holdings. Consider this also a signal to our community and civic leaders that they ought to demand better. Denver deserves a newspaper owner who supports its newsroom. If Alden isn’t willing to do good journalism here, it should sell The Post to owners who will.

That is a soft validation of the blunter call from the Newspaper Guild, which says, “Now is the time for new ownership at The Post and all other Digital First newspapers. The Denver Newspaper Guild implores Alden to sell its free-falling properties to local owners while there remains a chance to invest in quality journalism.”

“Sell now before it’s too late,” argues the Guild.

Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper took up the call on Monday, telling Rolling Stone in a conversation that touched on the Post’s circumstance: “I think it’s got to be sold.”

Saving this one newspaper won’t necessarily create a model for preserving journalism in other cities. But it could. What we know is this: It is necessary to defend newsrooms, to rise up on behalf of old and new media sufficiently staffed to cover cities, states, nations, and the world. Denver is as good a place as any for a pivot toward a more militant struggle—a struggle that recognizes, finally, and unequivocally, that we must sustain journalism in order to sustain democracy.