Lee Scott’s Shiny Green Lexus

Lee Scott’s Shiny Green Lexus

Wal-Mart’s CEO showcases his company’s hypocrisy.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Suppose you run one of the most environmentally offensive companies on the planet. Would you then expect people to be impressed that you drive an eco-friendly car? Last week Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott told the Chicago Tribune that he was selling his Volkswagen Bug and that he now drives a Lexus hybrid. “I love the idea of emission control,” he effused, “and I just hate dependence on foreign oil.”

Well, it’s helpful of Scott to do his part, even if he must explain himself in such a xenophobic manner. But Wal-Mart contributes to sprawl, pollution (by causing traffic problems), terrible land-use patterns and — speaking of “foreign oil” –overuse of cars (as we kill Main Street and replace it with big box stores, we drive more and walk less). Wal-Mart also, quite often, turns attractive, populous ecosystems into big ugly parking lots. Perhaps an even more profound environmental objection–and one that deserves more attention — is the way cheap, poorly made goods of the sort sold at Wal-Mart contribute to a culture of disposability that threatens to bury us in garbage. (For more on that problem, check out Heather Rogers’s excellent forthcoming book, Gone Tomorrow: The Hidden Life of Garbage, which The New Press will publish in October.) The Tribune shrewdly noted that Scott has “more than a personal interest” in the energy issue, since, many analysts believe, high gas prices are affecting Wal-Mart’s profits by squeezing its low-income shoppers.

But some of Wal-Mart’s newest customers aren’t affected by gas prices: They don’t drive cars. Perhaps hoping to distract attention from controversy over its urban expansion, Wal-Mart finally found an unspoiled piece of rural America, opening a Supercenter in Middlefield, Ohio, catering specifically to the local Amish community, with eighty-four spots to hitch your horse and buggy. Now that’s an environmentally sound vehicle.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x