Kurt Vonnegut

Kurt Vonnegut

Vonnegut’s best novels were as profound as any writing that deals with ultimate questions.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

See also John Leonard’s tribute to Vonnegut, and two of Kurt Vonnegut’s articles for The Nation: “The Worst Addiction of Them All,” from the December 31, 1983, issue, and “The Necessary Mile,” from July 7, 1979.

Reading about the death of Kurt Vonnegut, who contributed essays, reviews and speeches to this magazine over the past thirty years, we reflexively said, “So it goes.” Slaughterhouse-Five, we were repeatedly told in the obits, was popular with young people, but it’s misleading to consign Vonnegut’s work to the 1968 counterculture. It’s no disgrace to touch young hearts.

Vonnegut’s best novels were as profound as any writing ever was that deals with ultimate questions, such as death and the end of the world. He wrote in a kind of simpleminded style because what he had to tell, drawing on his own experience, was so dark and bleak that he had to wrap it in sardonic humor. He was the simpleton who knows the prince is really a frog living in a polluted swamp.

War was a form of human stupidity that aroused his anger because he’d fought in one and witnessed horrors no kid from Indiana should ever have to witness. Such as the firebombing of Dresden. He suspected, though, that humans were addicted to war. In these pages (December 31, 1983) he wrote that arms addicts who got high on preparing for World War III were as “repulsively addicted as any stockbroker passed out with his head in a toilet in the Port Authority bus terminal.”

He shared Mark Twain’s pessimism about the slipshod way the universe was run, but also called himself a “Christ-­worshiping agnostic,” who thought Jesus’ call for mercy in the Sermon on the Mount was the best idea our civilization has yet produced. He wrote in his last book, A Man Without a Country, “And if I should ever die, God Forbid, I hope you will say, ‘Kurt is up in heaven now.’ That’s my favorite joke.”

Kurt is up in heaven now.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x