Jeff Merkley’s Heroic Fight Against Gorsuch Is a Fight for the Constitution

Jeff Merkley’s Heroic Fight Against Gorsuch Is a Fight for the Constitution

Jeff Merkley’s Heroic Fight Against Gorsuch Is a Fight for the Constitution

The Oregon senator filibustered for more than 15 hours to challenge the awarding of a stolen seat to Trump’s nominee.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Senators are not merely allowed to filibuster against judicial nominees they deem to be inappropriate or illegitimate choices to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States.

They are required to do so.

The Constitution establishes a system of checks and balances. Along with the impeachment power (the exercise of which begins with the House), the provision for senatorial advice and consent is the essential underpinning of that system.

When a nominee to the high court is being considered, senators have the authority to grant consent or to withhold it. And, when they choose to withhold it out of concern about the corruption of the process by which judicial nominations are considered, senators have a duty to use every power available to them to prevent a rush to a wrongheaded judgement.

That is what Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley, among the ablest and most-experienced legislators in the chamber, was doing Tuesday night and Wednesday morning, when he held the floor for more than 15 hours with a traditional “talking filibuster” against Donald Trump’s nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.

“By stealing a Supreme Court seat for the first time in American history, the Senate is undermining the Court and the rule of law, and turning the highest court in the land into a political committee,” Merkley explained as he went to the floor at 6:46 Tuesday evening. “This assault on our democracy demands as robust a resistance as we can possibly mount.”

By 6:46 the following morning, he was still going. And he kept going until after 10 am.

Often standing beside an image of the Constitution, Merkley explained that Judge Gorsuch is seeking to fill a seat that, by all rights, should have gone to Judge Merrick Garland. Nominated by President Obama more than a year ago, rated as qualified by just about everyone (including Gorsuch), Garland was denied a hearing by Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell and other Republicans who openly lied about the process as they corrupted it.

McConnell’s Republicans claimed that the Senate has no tradition of considering and approving Supreme Court nominees in presidential election years. That was blatantly false, as Merkley explained Wednesday morning when he reviewed presidential-year deliberations going back to Thomas Jefferson’s presidency. Yet candidate Donald Trump took up the Republican lie as part of his presidential campaign in 2016. And now President Trump and his allies are seeking to take advantage of the crisis they created by advancing the Gorsuch nomination.

The Republican threat to use the “nuclear option” on Thursday—changing the rules of the Senate to upend a Democratic filibuster of the Gorsuch nomination—is a further corruption of the process.

While the Senate GOP “talks about their nuclear option,” said Merkley, “the refusal to consider Garland was the real nuclear detonation—all else follows.”

The Oregon senator’s determination to hold the floor of the Senate in order to drive that point home represents an inspired defense of the Constitution, the system of checks and balances, and the rule of law in a Capitol where the founding premises of the American experiment are under assault by McConnell and his minions.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x