I’m Trying to Find Hope, but This Campaign Isn’t Helping

I’m Trying to Find Hope, but This Campaign Isn’t Helping

I’m Trying to Find Hope, but This Campaign Isn’t Helping

In the wake of police killing Terrence Crutcher and Keith Lamont Scott, the first presidential debate offered nothing to suggest black lives truly matter.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

As I watched two presidential candidates outline their vision for America in one of the most hyped debates in history, after a week of unrest in Charlotte and deep pain in Tulsa following the deaths of two more black men, Keith Lamont Scott and Terrence Crutcher, at the hands of police officers, I confronted the reality that our future may be even dimmer than our past.

In the aftermath of the violence in Charlotte and in an America tense and torn over racial injustice, particularly in the criminal-justice system, many, including myself, were hoping for some relief and guidance. Instead, once again we got treated to two visions of America in which neither candidate was able to utter Crutcher’s or Scott’s name. Neither convinced me they fully understood my pain.

Hillary Clinton acknowledged the reality our politics have constructed, the one where structural racism and implicit bias hinder outcomes for black kids: “It’s just a fact that if you’re a young African-American man and you do the same thing as a young white man, you are more likely to be arrested, charged, convicted, and incarcerated.” Then there was the other dire vision of America, one that Donald Trump seems to believe exists—the communities where black and brown folk are “living in hell” and you get shot walking down the street. In this America, it seems that systematic racism and oppression don’t exist and the black community needs a “law and order” agenda—I’m still unclear exactly what that means—for its own good. Add in the fact that Trump refused to apologize for involvement in a racial-bias lawsuit that ended in a settlement—his main defense being that other companies were sued too—and the candidate didn’t do much to convince black people that our lives matter. But that also doesn’t seem to be his goal.

After a week where Trump implied that drugs were involved in either the police shootings in Charlotte and Tulsa or the protests of them (“If you’re not aware, drugs are a very, very big factor in what you’re watching on television”) and offered that there is a “lack of spirit between the white and the black,” his purported concern for black America’s safety was hard to believe.

Clinton, of course, had substantial and concrete ideas—eliminating mandatory minimums sentences and ending private prisons, for example. But we heard little detail about her plans, or her commitment to deliver on them, beyond the to-do list of reforms advocates have pursued for years, including during the years of a previous Clinton administration. Like some polls suggest is true of my peers, this black millennial has yet to be totally convinced.

I continue to weep for the America that we live in 2016, an America that is broken, torn, and bleeding at the seams with the blood of black men. At times I still have the hope of 2008; Sometimes I still foolishly continue thinking that maybe the future will be brighter. But both major parties have made it hard to sustain that feeling. I need candidates to come with concrete proposals and plans, more than just lip service, but also to understand the real pain that the black community is in, and has been for centuries.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x