Human Rights Experts Condemn Chinese Repression of Tibetan Buddhists

Human Rights Experts Condemn Chinese Repression of Tibetan Buddhists

Human Rights Experts Condemn Chinese Repression of Tibetan Buddhists

China usually manages to quash UN calls for action on its human rights violations. Not this time.


In the United Nations system, the heavyweight member countries more often than not can avoid or quash calls for action on human rights violations. This is particularly true of the permanent five members of the Security Council: China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. China, for example, effectively bars the Dalai Lama from ever entering UN premises, even for ecumenical gatherings of the world’s religious leaders.

Thus it was unusual to see six leading international human rights experts fielded by the UN Human Rights Council acting jointly recently to condemn Chinese repression and harassment of Tibetan Buddhists in Sichuan province, where there is a significant ethnic Tibetan population and numerous monasteries. The sharp criticisms came from monitors on freedom of religion, freedom of opinion and expression, involuntary disappearances, arbitrary detention, minority rights and the right to freedom of assembly and association.

The monitors – all internationally recognized experts who are unpaid, independent investigators and not UN officials — faulted China for what they call “severe human rights restrictions” in a region where tensions have been rising since the spring and where monks, nuns and lay people have turned to protests and self-immolation. The Kirti monastery, with 2,500 monks, has been a particular target of Chinese intimidation. But surveillance, a heavily armed security presence inside as well as around monasteries, arrests and disappearances are taking place in other locations also.

Heiner Bielefeldt, the UN Human Rights Council “special rapporteur” on freedom of religion, said in his report that heavy-handed Chinese tactics are only exacerbating existing tensions in the province. He called the intimidation in Sichuan “counterproductive.”


Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that moves the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories to readers like you.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy