House Democrats Are So Fed Up With the GOP’s Failure to Act on Guns That They Walked Out on the Speaker

House Democrats Are So Fed Up With the GOP’s Failure to Act on Guns That They Walked Out on the Speaker

House Democrats Are So Fed Up With the GOP’s Failure to Act on Guns That They Walked Out on the Speaker

Walkouts, chants, and demands for action on gun violence rock the first House session after an attack on an LGBTQ club.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The charade of silence used to work for House Republicans. As the death toll from mass shootings rose, and rose, and rose, the feudal serfs of the NRA would engage in a moment of silence.

Then, satisfied that they had done something symbolic, they would do nothing of consequence to address the crisis.

On Monday night, however, the charade of silence did not work for Paul Ryan.

During the first House session following the worst mass shooting in modern American history—the attack on an LGBTQ nightclub in Orlando that left 49 dead and 53 wounded—Speaker Ryan literally sought to silence the House of Representatives.

The speaker shushed the House and banged his gavel. Then he announced: “The chair asks that the House now observe a moment of silence in memory of the victims of the terrorist attack in Orlando.”

Ryan, a favorite of social conservatives, did not address what had happened as a hate crime, which targeted lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgender people, and their allies.

Ryan, a favorite of the National Rifle Association, did not address the fact that the victims were gunned down in a country where innocents are gunned down so frequently that House “moments of silence” have become routine.

The speaker simply walked through the motions.

This time, however, House Democrats refused to walk with him. Moments of silence are honorable and decent responses to horrible days. But these moments are sapped of meaning when they serve as a cloak for inaction. There had been scattered objections before, but this was different. This protest was bigger, and louder. It felt like a pivot point. Or, to be more precise, it should be a pivot point. As Congressman Mark Pocan, D-Wisconsin, has suggested, instead of “yet another moment of silence,” America needs “a moment of action.”

And, on Monday night, Pocan and other House Democrats acted.

A number of Democrats simply refused to join Ryan in what they decried as “the fetish of silence.”

Led by Connecticut Congressman Jim Himes, they left the floor in protest, rather than participate in Ryan’s charade. Himes, who represents a district that borders Newtown, where 20 children and six adults were slain in 2012 at the Sandy Hook Elementary School, said that House moments of silence following mass shootings had become “obnoxious expressions of smug incompetence.”

“Our silence does not honor the victims, it mocks them,” declared Himes.

Inside the House chamber on Monday night, other Democrats chanted, “Where’s the bill?”—demanding a debate on gun legislation.

Their protest came after Ryan tried to begin and end discussion of the mass shooting with his moment of silence. Assistant Democratic Leader Jim Clyburn, D–South Carolina, stepped to a floor microphone and asked Ryan when bills addressing gun violence would be taken up by the House. “I am really concerned that we have just today had a moment of silence and later this week the 17th…,” Clyburn began.

Ryan interrupted him and asked if the Democratic leader was a making a parliamentary inquiry. “Yes, Mr. Speaker,” Clyburn continued. “I am particularly interested [in talking] about three pieces of legislation that have been filed in response to Charleston.”

Ryan dismissed the inquiry as the South Carolina congressman was referring to the killing of nine people at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church a year ago this week (on June 17, 2015). The speaker’s office said that Ryan had determined that veteran civil-rights activist’s question was out of order.

Ryan’s spokeswoman said, remarkably, “It’s shameful that anyone would try to use a moment of silence honoring victims of a brutal terrorist attack to advance their own political agenda.”

She was wrong.

The shame was on Ryan Monday night.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that moves the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories to readers like you.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x