Government Funding Cannot Save Journalism

Government Funding Cannot Save Journalism

Government Funding Cannot Save Journalism

David Carr calls the idea that good watchdog media can be funded by the government "frankly preposterous."

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

In a conversation with The Nation‘s John Nichols and others about new models for journalism, New York Times media critic David Carr argues vigorously that government funding and subsidies can’t save journalism. "I don’t view government as either dependable, as efficacious and as capable." Carr supports this statement by explaining that today’s public models of journalism, like PBS and NPR, receive only about 20 percent of their budget from government funding. Additionally, other areas funded by the government, such as public schools, hospitals and infrastructure, lack money. Carr advocates for a hybrid model which would combine citizen funding with support from the private and charitable sectors.

He also argues that Nichols and McChesney, in their book The Death and Life of American Journalism, underestimate journalism’s "green shoots," new models that, although in their infancy, could provide real solutions to the current failings of American journalism. "You can make the argument…it’s not enough, but that’s not how change occurs," Carr argues. "You don’t flip the switch…and walk into a bright future."

–Morgan Ashenfelter

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x