Glenn Beck Thinks a Union Leader Is More Dangerous Than Bin Laden

Glenn Beck Thinks a Union Leader Is More Dangerous Than Bin Laden

Glenn Beck Thinks a Union Leader Is More Dangerous Than Bin Laden

According to Glenn Beck, SEIU organizer Stephen Lerner is a "mastermind worse than Osama bin Laden."

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

On March 19 at the Left Forum in New York City, a reporter for Glenn Beck’s website The Blaze secretly recorded SEIU’s Stephen Lerner giving a presentation on economic justice. Lerner’s speech called for Americans to band together to stop paying exploitative mortgage fees to the big banks that caused our financial crisis. The banks, Lerner says, should pay for taking bailout money and funneling it into bonuses for executives instead of lines of credit for consumers or homeowners, a point Lerner made in his Nation article, "Back at You, Glenn Beck."

On The Last Word on Tuesday night, MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell says that Beck’s paranoia has reached a new extreme. According to Beck, Lerner is a "mastermind worse than Osama bin Laden." Such a statement, O’Donnell says, is insulting to the families of those who died on September 11, 2001. O’Donnell says that if Beck thinks something worse than 9/11 is in the works, "I beg him to go to his nearest New York City fire station and tell the firefighters there, all of whom lost someone dear to them on 9/11, that something worse is coming. Tell those firefighters all about former union leader Stephen Lerner."

—Kevin Gosztola

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x