Ginsberg Hospitalization Spurs Court Speculation

Ginsberg Hospitalization Spurs Court Speculation

Ginsberg Hospitalization Spurs Court Speculation

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg was hospitalized Thursday at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for surgery relating to pancreatic cancer.

This is an exceptionally serious personal matter for Ginsberg and those who highly regard this remarkable jurist, a historic figure in the law who currently serves as the only woman serving on the nation’s highest court. Doctors found the justice’s cancerous growth early, but pancreatic cancers have poor rates of long-term survival.

It is also an exceptionally serious political matter for President Obama.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg was hospitalized Thursday at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for surgery relating to pancreatic cancer.

This is an exceptionally serious personal matter for Ginsberg and those who highly regard this remarkable jurist, a historic figure in the law who currently serves as the only woman serving on the nation’s highest court. Doctors found the justice’s cancerous growth early, but pancreatic cancers have poor rates of long-term survival.

It is also an exceptionally serious political matter for President Obama.

Obama would say, correctly, that the first best hope is for Ginsberg to return to good health and the bench. She is a remarkably able jurist who still has much to contribute to the court.

But if Ginsberg chooses to leave the court, the new president will find himself in the rare position of selecting a Supreme Court Justice in the first months of his first term.

Obama’s selection to fill a seat on the bench vacated by Ginsberg, one of the court’s most liberal members, would not be likely to tip the balance on the closely divided court.

Or the gender balance.

Obama, a former professor of constitutional law, would almost certainly nominate a jurist with views regarding the law similar to those of Ginsberg. And it is difficult to imagine that he would not choose woman.

There are plenty of prospective nominees.

Among the federal judges being mentioned are:

* Judge Diane Wood of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago

* Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco

* Judge Sonia Sotomayor of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York

* Judge Margaret McKeown of the 9th Circuit in San Francisco

If Obama were to nominate Wardlaw or Sotomayor, he would be promoting not just a woman but the court’s first Hispanic justice.

Other prospects include:

* Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm

* Former Harvard Law School dean Elena Kagan (Obama’s nominee for, solicitor general, a position that historically has been a stepping stone to the high court)

* Stanford University law professor Pam Karlan

* Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Leah Sears.

And here’s a name that should be on the list: Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard law professor who currently chairs chair the five-member Congressional Oversight Panel created to oversee the implementation of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act.

Warren’s aggressive efforts to figure out how the federal bailout money is being spent have made her a hero to those who did not already know that she was a hero for her unrelenting efforts to defend the interests of working families when the Congress was rewriting bankruptcy laws.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x