Friedmanism at the Fed II

Friedmanism at the Fed II

  The House Oversight Committee continues its investigation of former New York Fed Board Chairman Stephen Friedman.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Earlier this month, The Nation reported on questions being raised by the House Committee on Government and Oversight Reform regarding former New York Federal Reserve Bank Chair Stephen Friedman’s purchase of Goldman Sachs stock at a time when he was prohibited from even owning it.

The fact that Friedman nearly doubled his Goldman holdings in December 2008–while the public was still in the dark about which banks were benefiting from the AIG bailout and Goldman was the greatest domestic beneficiary to the tune of $13 billion in taxpayer money–not only led to his resignation from the Fed, it also put the incestuous and murky relationship between the Federal Reserve and Wall Street on full display.

Now Committee Chairman Edolphus Towns and Congressman Stephen Lynch have taken the investigation a step further, asking Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke for “all documents related to Mr. Friedman’s purchase of Goldman stock” and the granting of a waiver that allowed him to simultaneously serve on the Goldman and New York Fed boards.

“At a time when Mr. Friedman was prohibited from owning Goldman Sachs stock, he bought over a million dollars more of it without notifying the Federal Reserve,” said Chairman Towns. “This raises serious questions about transparency, fairness and the appearance of a cozy relationship between Wall Street and the government.”

“Normally, regulators are not allowed to personally invest in companies that they are regulating,” said Congressman Lynch. “This arrangement at the Federal Reserve raises major conflict-of-interest concerns. In addition, our committee will need to determine if Mr. Friedman capitalized personally and financially, at the expense of the taxpayer, based on information he obtained as a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.”

Hopefully the Committee is also looking at what information Friedman might have capitalized on from his role on the Goldman board too, since an attorney for Friedman confirmed to The Nation that Goldman board members were briefed regularly in late 2007 and early 2008 regarding how much money AIG owed Goldman.

The letter to Bernanke also indicates that Towns and Lynch are interested in looking beyond the case of Friedman. They have asked for copies of all waiver requests–over the past ten years–by regional fed bank board members in connection with ownership or purchase of stocks, and the decisions that were made on those waivers. (There are actually a lot of good questions laid out in the letter–you can check it out in its entirety here.)

Kudos to Towns and Lynch for staying on top of this. In this casino economy where the rules seem rigged so the house always wins, their oversight offers the potential for a measure of accountability.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x