Fresh Airwaves

Fresh Airwaves

Media critics are more accustomed to pointing out problems than pointing to victories.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Media critics are more accustomed to pointing out problems than pointing to victories. But the emerging, still inchoate and decentralized media and democracy movement was adding new notches to its belt as a result of two rulings by the Federal Communications Commission.

First, on January 20 the FCC decided to permit the licensing of low-power radio stations, which will open the airwaves to local religious, educational and community organizations nationwide. Despite fierce lobbying by the politically connected National Association of Broadcasters, representing a big media that keeps getting bigger, the FCC has approved the creation of cheap-to-build, neighborhood-based stations with limited power–up to l00 watts, which can reach three and a half miles. (Commercial stations often have 50,000 watts and broadcast into many states.) FCC chairman William Kennard said the decision would increase diversity in an era when mergers have led to an unprecedented level of concentration of ownership and commercialization of content in the wake of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. “This will bring many new voices to the airwaves,” he declared.

Many of those voices mobilized to bring about the decision, firing off thousands of e-mail and snail-mail missives to the FCC attesting to the unique value of microradio. Although the Internet opens up the possibility of expanding listenership beyond the bounds of geography, media activists recognize that nothing can yet match microradio’s reach. Some initiated lawsuits and carried out militant civil disobedience, fighting a cat-and-mouse war with FCC enforcement officials who shut down small pirate stations like New York’s Steal This Radio, which broadcast for many months from an illegally occupied tenement on the Lower East Side [see Schechter, “(Low) Power to the People,” May 24, 1999]. The FCC decision was not an unmitigated triumph: To assuage broadcasters, who have raised the specter of interference with commercial radio signals, the agency is imposing strict technical standards, which some small stations may find difficult to meet.

On the second front, media activists in Pittsburgh are claiming victory in their fight to keep the city’s PBS station from selling off an affiliate known for hard-hitting community programming. As Pat Aufderheide reported here last week in “McCain’s Real Sin,” the financially strapped WQED was trying to engineer the sale of WQEX’s license to a religious broadcaster, Cornerstone, that had teamed up with a commercial TV chain called Paxson. The story made news when it came out that presidential candidate John McCain–who received campaign contributions from Paxson–had intervened, writing a letter to pressure the FCC to act quickly on the matter.

Shortly thereafter, the FCC ruled against the activists and the station seemed lost. But in a concession to legitimate concerns, the FCC also issued some loose but substantive guidelines requiring educational TV license-holders to offer more than just Bible-thumping. This proved too much for Cornerstone, which suddenly pulled out of the deal, killing the swap and, for the moment, preserving the PBS station. “We did it,” said Jerry Starr, who heads Citizens for Independent Public Broadcasting. “We saved the station.” Religious broadcasters are campaigning for legislation that would let them show anything they want on educational TV channels. But for now, along with radio pirates weary from a long war with the FCC, the grassroots coalition in Pittsburgh is remembering what it’s like to celebrate.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x