Feingold on Torture Judge: “Grounds for Impeachment”

Feingold on Torture Judge: “Grounds for Impeachment”

Feingold on Torture Judge: “Grounds for Impeachment”

Torture memo author Jay Bybee, who outlined procedures for inflicting cruel and unusual punishments on prisoners in U.S. custody, should of course be impeached and removed from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals bench.

But how did Bybee, who was either inept or corrupt, win Senate approval to serve as a federal judge?

As it happens, it was not easy.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Torture memo author Jay Bybee, who outlined procedures for inflicting cruel and unusual punishments on prisoners in U.S. custody, should of course be impeached and removed from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals bench.

But how did Bybee, who was either inept or corrupt, win Senate approval to serve as a federal judge?

As it happens, it was not easy.

Former President Bush appointed Bybee, an aggressively ideological assistant attorney general to a position on the nation’s largest appellate court on May 22, 2002.

Because Bybee was already a highly controversial figure, a narrowly Democratic Senate refused to act on the nomination that year.

Bybee’s nomination died when it was “returned without action” in December, 2002.

Control of the Senate shifted from the Democrats to Bush’s Republicans in January, 2003, and Bush immediately resubmitted the nomination.

A month later, the Senate Judiciary Committee split on the nomination, with 10 Republicans and 2 Democrats backing it while 6 Democrats were opposed. So, with a 12-6 endorsement, Bybee’s nomination went to the full Senate.

The full Senate vote came on March 13, 2003, when Bybee was confirmed by a vote of 74-19.

Who cast the “no” votes?

Barbara Boxer (D-CA)

Robert Byrd (D-WV)

Hillary Clinton (D-NY)

Jon Corzine (D-NJ)

Mark Dayton (D-MN)

Dick Durbin (D-IL)

Russ Feingold (D-WI)

Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)

Tom Harkin (D-IA)

Daniel Inouye (D-HI)

Ted Kennedy (D-MA)

Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)

Carl Levin (D-MI)

Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)

Patty Murray (D-WA)

Jack Reed (D-RI)

Paul Sarbanes (D-MD)

Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)

Ron Wyden (D-OR)

Feingold battled hardest, focusing during the confirmation process on gaining Senate access to the memos written by Bybee while serving with the Office of Legal Counsel. During the March 13th, 2003, debate, Feingold told the Senate:

“The administration should be able to agree to an acceptable procedure to allow the Judiciary Committee to review Mr. Bybee’s OLC opinions. Given the recent history of many OLC opinions being made public, it is hard to believe that there are no opinions authored by Mr. Bybee that could be disclosed without damaging the deliberative process. Indeed, it is very hard to give credence to the idea that OLC’s independence would be compromised by the release of some selection of the opinions of interest to members of the Judiciary Committee or the Senate.”

The essential OLC opinions never were released — until now.

And they confirm that Feingold had reason to be concerned.

What’s the senator saying now?

“The idea that one of the architects of this perversion of the law is now sitting on the federal bench is very troubling,” Feingold argues. “The memos offer some of the most explicit evidence yet that Mr. Bybee and others authorized torture and they suggest that grounds for impeachment can be made,” says the senator.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x