Ending Federal Lawlessness: DOJ Eases Off Medical Pot

Ending Federal Lawlessness: DOJ Eases Off Medical Pot

Ending Federal Lawlessness: DOJ Eases Off Medical Pot

During the 2008 campaign, one of candidate Barack Obama’s best applause lines was a promise to restore respect for science when it came to federal policy making.

On Monday, President Obama kept a piece of that promise when his Department of Justice issued a directive ordering agency lawyers not to prosecute individuals who use or prescribe medical marijuana in states that have legalized the drug for that purpose.

“It will not be a priority to use federal resources to prosecute patients with serious illnesses or their caregivers who are complying with state laws on medical marijuana, but we will not tolerate drug traffickers who hide behind claims of compliance with state law to mask activities that are clearly illegal,” explained Attorney General Eric Holder. “This balanced policy formalizes a sensible approach that the Department has been following since January: effectively focus our resources on serious drug traffickers while taking into account state and local laws.”

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

During the 2008 campaign, one of candidate Barack Obama’s best applause lines was a promise to restore respect for science when it came to federal policy making.

On Monday, President Obama kept a piece of that promise when his Department of Justice issued a directive ordering agency lawyers not to prosecute individuals who use or prescribe medical marijuana in states that have legalized the drug for that purpose.

“It will not be a priority to use federal resources to prosecute patients with serious illnesses or their caregivers who are complying with state laws on medical marijuana, but we will not tolerate drug traffickers who hide behind claims of compliance with state law to mask activities that are clearly illegal,” explained Attorney General Eric Holder. “This balanced policy formalizes a sensible approach that the Department has been following since January: effectively focus our resources on serious drug traffickers while taking into account state and local laws.”

In the overall scheme of the drug-policy debate, this is a relatively small — and cautious — step.

But for medical-marijuana advocates, the administration’s formal embrace of a more responsible approach represents a major breakthrough.

“This is a huge victory for medical-marijuana patients,” says Steph Sherer, executive director of Americans for Safe Access, a medical-marijuana advocacy group. “This indicates that President Obama intends to keep his promise … and represents a significant departure from the policies of the Bush administration.”

The jury is in on medical marijuana and the evidence argues for removing barriers — federal, state and local — to its use by patients seeking relief from pain and nausea associated with cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis and other debilitating illnesses and conditions.

The Obama administration’s move respects that evidence. As such, it represents a clearer embrace of science with regard to drugs and drug policy by a White House than we have seen since the days when Jimmy Carter explored enlightened approaches.

As New York Congressman Maurice Hinchey said Monday, “Today, common sense won out over ideological stubbornness as our nation’s law enforcement agency formally adopted a new and well-balanced policy on medical marijuana use. Across the country, individual states have enacted laws that allow individuals who are sick and suffering to use medical marijuana with a doctor’s prescription only to have DOJ officials arrest and prosecute them anyway. This was a policy that was misguided and wrong from the start and I’m very pleased that the Obama administration’s Justice Department, under the leadership of Attorney General Holder, has put an end to it.”

Hinchey has for many years advocated for a shift in federal policies with regard to medical marijuana. Among other things, the New York Democrat has sought to amend Department of Justice appropriation bills in order to prevent the DOJ from using funds to prosecute individuals who use medical marijuana in compliance with state law.

Earlier this year, Hinchey secured House support for a requirement that the DOJ report to Congress about the administration’s position on medical marijuana.

That won’t be necessary now, as the DOJ order clarifies the issue — and sets a sounder policy regarding the lawful use of marijuana for medical purposes.

“Today,” says Hinchey, “those patients no longer have to worry that the medicine they’ve been legally using in their states will result in them being thrown in jail. Our Justice Department will now let these patients use medical marijuana in accordance with state law and federal prosecutors will instead focus their attention on more pressing legal matters that warrant their time and attention.”

The next step should be to codify the DOJ directive by passing Massachusetts Congressman Barney Franks’ Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act (HR 2835), which would formally reschedule cannabis as a Schedule II drug and eliminate federal authority to prosecute medical marijuana patients or providers in states where it is legal for medical use.

Even before that happens, however, the DOJ directive opens the way for states to enact laws permitting the use of medical marijuana. Legislative bills and referendums have already been proposed in a number of states. Americans for Safe Access tracks the progress, which should accelerate considerably now that Obama’s Department of Justice has abandoned the backward and punitive policies of past administrations.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x