Elizabeth Warren Says She’ll Consider Massachusetts Senate Run

Elizabeth Warren Says She’ll Consider Massachusetts Senate Run

Elizabeth Warren Says She’ll Consider Massachusetts Senate Run

Massachusetts might well elect Warren to the Senate, where she could lead the fight for reform.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

On Sunday, when President Obama let it be known that he would not appoint Elizabeth Warren as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, it was pretty clear that the Harvard law professor who has become a hero to progressives was going to need a new approach to Washington. It was equally clear that the logical approach was to consider making a run for Ted Kennedy’s old US Senate seat representing Massachusetts.

Warren agreed.

Asked Monday whether she would consider making a run for the seat now occupied by US Senator Scott Brown, R-Wall Street, Warren replied: “I’ve been working 14 hours a day on trying to stand this…agency up, really for more than a year now…. It’s time for a little vacation for me. When I go home, I’ll do more thinking then. But I need to do that thinking not from Washington.”

That’s more than enough encouragement for the Progressive Change Campaign Committee—long the chief champion for getting Warren into a bully pulpit where she can advocate in a meaningful way for consumer protection and real regulations on banks and speculators.

The PCCC has started a “Draft Elizabeth Warren for the U.S. Senate” campaign.

Quoting from Sunday’s Nation article outling arguments for a Warren run, the PCCC says: "Paul Wellstone used to say he could use ten more progressives in the Senate—‘or one Elizabeth Warren.’ Elizabeth Warren has a track record of holding Wall Street accountable and fighting for regular people like us. Now, she’s considering winning back Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat from Republican Scott Brown in 2012. Let’s tell her she’d have our support!"

Warren is considering making the run. That’s a prospect that will excite progressives—and scare Wall Street.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x