An Educated Investment

An Educated Investment

Viany Orozco State legislators can help those most affected with stimulus money for education.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Viany Orozco

State legislators can help those most affected with stimulus money for education. An Educated Investment

Viany Orozco

February 20, 2009

President Obama signed the stimulus bill on Tuesday, which includes $54 billion dollars of aid to states for education. How state legislators decide to allocate this funding will make a great difference in the ability of low and moderate-income post-secondary students to persist in their studies. Their decisions can also avert further declines in the resources available to the institutions where a majority of them enroll: community colleges.

Low and moderate income students are most sensitive to tuition and fee increases as well as to overall economic hardship. For this reason, state leaders should not treat all institutions in the same manner. In order to preserve access and affordability, policy makers should give community colleges the financial support they need to avert increases in their tuition. Students attending these institutions already receive lower amounts of federal, state and institutional funding, despite the fact that they have the least amount of resources to invest in their education . In the face of additional educational expenses, many of them will be forced to suspend their studies.

A new report by the Delta Cost Project, Trends in College Spending, further illustrates the negative impacts that additional cuts in funding to community colleges can have on its students. The report finds that while spending has been increasing at most higher education institutions, it has decreased at community colleges. Between 2002 and 2005, spending increased 2.5 percent per full time equivalent student among public research universities, but community colleges experienced a 6 percent reduction. Community colleges have also experienced the most dramatic spending cuts in instruction per student among public higher education institutions.

In summary, Trends shows that as public community colleges have become the primary access point for almost half of all post-secondary students, especially students who have been under-represented in higher education (such as minority, low-income, and first-generation college students), the resources of these institutions have declined. This trend is in part caused by the lower funding they receive from the states. In 2006 states subsidized an average of $7,100 per student per year in costs for students attending public four year universities, versus $6,500 for community colleges.

President Obama and Congress recognized the long-term educational needs of the country and its citizens. To maximize the impact of these funds, however, the college related allocation of these funds should target institutions and individuals who are at the highest risk of leaving their studies due to the economic hardships caused by this recession. Since the stimulus legislation funds have to go through the nation’s statehouses before they are appropriated to educational institutions, state legislators and governors have a unique opportunity to invest in students and institutions with the greatest need.

Viany Orozco is a Policy Analyst in the Economic Opportunity Program at Demos: Ideas & Action. Viany’s research and analysis at Demos focuses on the economic challenges facing young people, with a particular focus on state-based policy solutions.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x