Do Terrorists Deserve Due Process?

Do Terrorists Deserve Due Process?

Hayes debates Scarborough over the constitutional rights of terrorists.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The hosts of Morning Joe turn to Chris Hayes to debate the merits
of a Wall Street Journal editorial called “Cheney’s Revenge,” which
suggests that the American people prefer the way Bush and Cheney dealt
with terrorists by skipping over the Miranda rights that are normally
afforded to criminals. Hayes and host Joe Scarborough disagree on
whether most Americans want Miranda rights to be applied to foreign
terrorist suspects.

Hayes argues that no matter what people want, due process of law is in
the Constitution and applies to foreign criminals and illegal
immigrants. “This is a really important point to hammer home,” Hayes
says. “The Constitution does not…simply apply to citizens. This is
absolutely 1,000 percent settled law and the 14th amendment means that
it [applies] to anyone who’s picked up and arrested.”

Scarborough counters that the Miranda rights were not applied to Nazi
prisoners of war and so do not need to be applied to those captured in
the war on terror. He also points out that war criminals have different
rights than regular criminals. Hayes counters by saying that, “you
cannot just…prior to the actual constitutional due process, dub
someone a war criminal and then deny them the due process that’s
required of the Constitution.”

Morgan Ashenfelter

Check out more great Nation videos on our YouTube channel.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x