Dem Debate Blues

Dem Debate Blues

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

If you were lucky enough to have missed Wednesday’s debate, then, yes, it really was as bad as everyone is saying. Here’s the transcript and here’s a good video summary prepared by TPMtv.

The ABC moderators did a notably bad job by avoiding substantive issues and focusing their energies on a trivial and “relentless stream of ‘gotcha’ questions,” in the words of my boss, Katrina vanden Heuvel. That’s why Editor & Publisher called this debate “perhaps the most embarrassing performance by the media in a major presidential debate in years.”

During the first half of the conversation, moderators George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson avoided any mention of real issues. As the Los Angeles Times noted yesterday,”With the moderators and Clinton raising assorted questions about Obama’s past for the first half of the debate, issues received relatively short shrift. Not until 50 minutes in was a policy issue–Iraq–asked about by the moderators.”

The insipid line of questioning took us through tired campaign non-issues like Clinton’s Bosnia gaffe, Obama’s talk about “bitter” small-town voters, the rhetoric of the Illinois Senator’s former pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and the fact that Obama rarely wears an American flag lapel pin. The most irrelevant line of questioning came from Stephanopoulos who tried to interrogate Obama on his glancing relationship with University of Illinois at Chicago professor and former Weather Underground leader William Ayers. Obama’s “ties” to Ayers have been an obsession of Fox News host Sean Hannity,who according to Salon reportedly pressed Stephanopoulos to ask about Ayers at the debate.

In the eloquent words of an open letter to ABC written by an ad-hoc group of journalists and media analysts, including many Nation writers, “The debate was a revolting descent into tabloid journalism and a gross disservice to Americans concerned about the great issues facing the nation and the world…ABC seemed less interested in provoking serious discussion than in trying to generate cheap shot sound-bites for later rebroadcast. The questions asked by Mr. Stephanopoulos and Mr. Gibson were a disgrace, and the subsequent attempts to justify them by claiming that they reflect citizens’ interest are an insult to the intelligence of those citizens and ABC’s viewers.”

If you agree, please sign on to MoveOn.org’s new petition demanding that ABC and other networks focus their resources on the issues that affect people’s lives, and support FAIR’s efforts to keep up the pressure on ABC and other outlets.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x