Define Security, Mr. President

Define Security, Mr. President

A three-year freeze on public spending on everything except entitlements, veterans benefits and security?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

A three-year freeze on public spending on everything except entitlements, veterans benefits and security?

Two years into a major recession — a devastating depression in many place — just how is this administration defining that convenient little word "secure?"

Democrats and Republicans both like to genuflect before the altar of providing "security"– from terrorism, for example. The truth is, most of us are safe. Reason magazine calculated in 2006 that even if terrorists managed to crash one of this country’s 18,000 commercial flights every week, the average person’s chance of being on that flight would still be one in 135,000. Deficit or no deficit, Washington keeps on spending on weapons and contractors — even when that’s the spending that’s racked up the bill — and billions of dollars are unaccounted for.

Turn to hunger and Americans are not so secure. A recent study by Washington University in St. Louis found that half of all of us receive food stamps before we turn twenty. More than 38 million Americans — one in eight — now receive food stamps, a record high. Nearly one in five told pollsters for Gallup recently that they had lacked the money to buy the food they needed at least once in the last year.

If it’s political security Obama’s worried about, he’d better look take a closer look. While his critics in the beltway talk deficits and terror, we spoke to J.D. Meadows, a member of the Council of Conservative Citizens who joined that group, not for fear of bombers but because where he lives in Mississippi the economy has crashed.

Said J.D.’s recruiter at the Council, the biggest issues growing numbers are the economy, jobs, and illegal immigration. And illegal immigration isn’t even a close third. "It’s more or less all about the economy," he said. "That’s what’s driving the growth right now." His words.

If the president is truly concerned with American lives (not to mention his own) real security, and not just Republicans’ and Blue Dogs’ rhetoric, perhaps he should listen not only to his base but also to people like J.D.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x