Debating Obama: A Forum

Debating Obama: A Forum

Responses to Eric Alterman’s "Kabuki Democracy," featuring Michael Kazin, Barbara Ehrenreich, Norman Ornstein, Salim Muwakkil, Theda Skocpol and Chris Bowers.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Eric Alterman’s "Kabuki Democracy," first published on TheNation.com on July 7, provoked a lively conversation around the web. Politico‘s Abby Phillip took Alterman’s article as a sign that "for many liberals, this is the summer of their discontent." Writing for The New Republic, Neera Tanden charged that Alterman’s diagnosis of the administration’s shortcomings "belittles the substantive and far-reaching change that has already occurred under Obama." Think Progress blogger Matt Yglesias concurred with many of Alterman’s points about our imbalanced political system, adding that reforming it  "is going to take a long, hard slog."

To carry on this important discussion, The Nation organized a more formal debate in our pages, inviting a small group of writers and scholars to weigh in on Alterman’s assessment of the Obama administration’s successes and failings. Their contributions, published in the August 30/September 6 issue, appear below.

Michael Kazin, "Building a Movement by Offering Solutions"
Barbara Ehrenreich, "The Corpo-Obama-Geithner-Petraeus State"
Norman Ornstein, "Ending the Permanent Campaign"
Salim Muwakkil, "Obama, The Right and Race"
Theda Skocpol, "Obama’s Healthcare Achievements"
Chris Bowers, "There Will Be No Silver Bullet"

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x