Dawn Johnsen’s Withdrawal

Dawn Johnsen’s Withdrawal

Ari Melber explains why Obama dropped Dawn Johnsen as a nominee for the Office of Legal Counsel.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The Nation‘s Net Movement Correspondent Ari Melber joins GRITtv to discuss why Dawn Johnsen withdrew her nomination for Office of Legal Counsel and the significance of her move. The right came out fighting against Johnsen’s nomination primarily because of what conservatives have called her "extremist" views on abortion. Melber explains that though the right attacked her for her abortion views, she was nominated for her history of upholding the rule of law and human rights.

Melber argues that Obama deserves credit for nominating Johnsen, but dropping her when it was clear she wasn’t going to get a vote is "confounding and concerning." Host Laura Flanders asks if her withdrawal is a sign that Obama has cooled on enforcing the rule of law within his administration. Melber counters that it’s probably not so black and white. "I think that the people in the administration who are pushing against these [rule of law] issues are winning these battles," Melber said. "And [Johnsen] being pushed out here…is a clear sign of that. Justice and human rights groups have been all too silent on these issues."

–Morgan Ashenfelter

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x