David Brooks is Pessimistic

David Brooks is Pessimistic

Brooks column today is sort of a classic from him: on the surface, it’s open-minded, and ambivalent, but ultimately, underneath it all, he manages to advance a deeply conservative argument. His basic point is: yes, everyone’s calling for more regulation in the wake of the financial debacle, but it’s unclear if it was a lack of regulation caused things to go haywire in the first place. (There’s a point there, the ultimate cause might very well just be capitalism. Another newspaper columnist, Karl Marx noted that insane booms, busts and periodic crises were typical of this particular economic system.)

More revealingly, Brooks, also argues that good regulation is really hard and we’ll probably screw it up. So why bother?

(I have to say I admire this style of argumentation immensely. My dream is to someday get to write a column for large audiences where I can smuggle my lefty worldview in under the wrapping of cheerful humor and charitable engagement with my ideological foes.)

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Brooks column today is sort of a classic from him: on the surface, it’s open-minded, and ambivalent, but ultimately, underneath it all, he manages to advance a deeply conservative argument. His basic point is: yes, everyone’s calling for more regulation in the wake of the financial debacle, but it’s unclear if it was a lack of regulation caused things to go haywire in the first place. (There’s a point there, the ultimate cause might very well just be capitalism. Another newspaper columnist, Karl Marx noted that insane booms, busts and periodic crises were typical of this particular economic system.)

More revealingly, Brooks, also argues that good regulation is really hard and we’ll probably screw it up. So why bother?

(I have to say I admire this style of argumentation immensely. My dream is to someday get to write a column for large audiences where I can smuggle my lefty worldview in under the wrapping of cheerful humor and charitable engagement with my ideological foes.)

This is a good window into conservative thinking on this and many topics: if a task is difficult, government isn’t up to it. But while it’s true that establishing a effective and and dynamic regulatory regime is difficult so was winning World War II and building the interstate highway system. Somehow we managed.

Revealingly, he puts his finger on one of the major obstacles to effective governance here:

We’re going to need squads of low-paid regulators who can stay ahead of the highly paid bankers, auditors and analysts who pace this industry (and who themselves failed to anticipate this turmoil).

Will regulators always be paid less than their high-flying counterparts on Wall Street? Sure! But I’m sure we can close the gap. Hell, if paying a team of regulators obscene amount of money (I’m talking seven figure salaries) forestalled this crisis it would still be a winning investment.

Dear reader,

I hope you enjoyed the article you just read. It’s just one of the many deeply reported and boundary-pushing stories we publish every day at The Nation. In a time of continued erosion of our fundamental rights and urgent global struggles for peace, independent journalism is now more vital than ever.

As a Nation reader, you are likely an engaged progressive who is passionate about bold ideas. I know I can count on you to help sustain our mission-driven journalism.

This month, we’re kicking off an ambitious Summer Fundraising Campaign with the goal of raising $15,000. With your support, we can continue to produce the hard-hitting journalism you rely on to cut through the noise of conservative, corporate media. Please, donate today.

A better world is out there—and we need your support to reach it.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x