Cyberwar: When We Do It, It’s OK; If They Do It, It’s War

Cyberwar: When We Do It, It’s OK; If They Do It, It’s War

Cyberwar: When We Do It, It’s OK; If They Do It, It’s War

The ultimate in cyber-hypocrisy from the Pentagon.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The ultimate, perhaps, in hypocrisy? Though it’s widely been reported that the United States and Israel worked together to sabotage Iran’s nuclear program by means of a cyberattack, one using a computer worm called Stuxnet that wrecked as many as a thousand of Iran’s centrifuges, now the Pentagon says that if anyone does anything like that to us, it’s an act of war—and the United States might feel free to retaliate using military means.

Reported the New York Times yesterday:

“The Pentagon, trying to create a formal strategy to deter cyberattacks on the United States, plans to issue a new strategy soon declaring that a computer attack from a foreign nation can be considered an act of war that may result in a military response.”

 It’s a policy under development by the Obama administration for two years, as the article points out:

“In May 2009…the head of the United States Strategic Command, Gen. Kevin P. Chilton, told reporters that in the event of a cyberattack ‘the law of armed conflict will apply,’ and warned that ‘I don’t think you take anything off the table’ ” in considering a response. ‘Why would we constrain ourselves?’ he asked, according to an article about his comments that appeared in Stars and Stripes."

And if Iran had not “constrained itself” after the US-Israeli sabotage campaign, which is ongoing and which, apparently, involves the kidnapping and assassination of Iranian scientists, too? Don’t ask.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x