Congress Rebuffs the FCC

Congress Rebuffs the FCC

The revolution may, in fact, be televised–and on C-Span, no less.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The revolution may, in fact, be televised–and on C-Span, no less. The Congressional revolt against the Federal Communications Commission’s loosening of media ownership rules has stunned a Bush Administration that is not used to facing bipartisan opposition on Capitol Hill. On July 23, in an unprecedented rebuff of big media’s agenda, the House of Representatives voted 400 to 21 for an appropriations bill that includes language blocking implementation of a rule that would permit a single corporation to own television stations reaching 45 percent of Americans. Then, Democratic Senator Byron Dorgan announced that after the August Congressional recess, he will use a rare “Resolution of Disapproval” to force a Senate vote to reverse both the television ownership measure and a “cross-ownership” rule change that would allow one company to own the daily newspaper and most of the major television and radio stations in a single city.

“I do expect in the Senate there is a very powerful appetite to curb if not all, then certainly a significant part, of the rules the FCC has crafted,” said Dorgan, whose co-sponsor is Republican Trent Lott. “The important thing here is to get this matter back at the FCC [and force the commission to] readdress it because there’s strong feeling in the Congress, and I believe in the American people, that they did not handle these decisions correctly,” declared Lott.

While conservative columnist William Safire still marvels at how he is lined up with Code Pink-Women for Peace in the fight with the FCC, it’s a fact that opposition to media monopoly makes for strange bedfellows. Fear that a dumbed-down, one-size-fits-all media will stifle diversity linked the National Organization for Women, the National Rifle Association, Common Cause, media unions, minority journalists, musicians and hometown activists in a coalition that flooded the FCC with more than 2 million communications opposing the rules changes. And the ideological diversity of the grassroots opposition has been maintained as the issue has moved to Congress.

Despite presidential veto threats, Republicans in both chambers keep balking. Visits home in August should strengthen their resolve, as constituents vent frustrations with the excesses of the media giants. Even country singer Merle Haggard is on board, with a song, “That’s the News,” that bangs corporate media for echoing–rather than questioning–the President’s spin on war with Iraq.

The next challenge is to get Democrats thinking bigger. An amendment by Representatives Maurice Hinchey and David Price to block the cross-ownership rule change failed when sixty House Democrats opposed it. Many said they feared that pushing too hard would provoke a Bush veto. But when Democrats are less willing to challenge the Administration than Trent Lott, they are becoming a too-loyal opposition. Instead of compromising, Congressional Democrats should follow the lead of Vermont Independent Bernie Sanders, who is promoting town-hall meetings across the country this summer to back not just a rollback of the FCC rule changes but a broader push to reassert public control of the public’s airwaves.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x