Christopher Hayes on Republican Flip-Flopping on Libya

Christopher Hayes on Republican Flip-Flopping on Libya

Christopher Hayes on Republican Flip-Flopping on Libya

Congress doesn’t want a vote on Libya. That will make it all the easier to blame the Democrats if the mission goes sour.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As US involvement progresses in Libya, the absence of a Congressional vote for intervention will prove to be strategically advantageous to Republicans, The Nation’s Chris Hayes argues on MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show. Members of the GOP will be able to respond to whether or not the mission is successful and not be “tethered” to any position, preventing them from looking hypocritical.

Maddow calls out several members Republicans, including Newt Gingrich, who flip-flopped on intervention once Obama decided to support military action. This uncertainty among members reveals an internal struggle among Republicans to juggle their “war reflexes” with their instinctive opposition to Democrats, as Maddow puts it.

“Congress doesn’t actually want to take a vote on this," Hayes says. "If you are John Boehner, you are much happier not having voted on the Libya intervention because six months from now, you can say more or less whatever you want and no ones going to throw that vote back in your face."

—Sara Jerving

 

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x