Christopher Hayes on Republican Flip-Flopping on Libya

Christopher Hayes on Republican Flip-Flopping on Libya

Christopher Hayes on Republican Flip-Flopping on Libya

Congress doesn’t want a vote on Libya. That will make it all the easier to blame the Democrats if the mission goes sour.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As US involvement progresses in Libya, the absence of a Congressional vote for intervention will prove to be strategically advantageous to Republicans, The Nation’s Chris Hayes argues on MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show. Members of the GOP will be able to respond to whether or not the mission is successful and not be “tethered” to any position, preventing them from looking hypocritical.

Maddow calls out several members Republicans, including Newt Gingrich, who flip-flopped on intervention once Obama decided to support military action. This uncertainty among members reveals an internal struggle among Republicans to juggle their “war reflexes” with their instinctive opposition to Democrats, as Maddow puts it.

“Congress doesn’t actually want to take a vote on this," Hayes says. "If you are John Boehner, you are much happier not having voted on the Libya intervention because six months from now, you can say more or less whatever you want and no ones going to throw that vote back in your face."

—Sara Jerving

 

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x