The Breakdown: Are Antitrust Laws a Thing of the Past?

The Breakdown: Are Antitrust Laws a Thing of the Past?

The Breakdown: Are Antitrust Laws a Thing of the Past?

With AT&T’s announcement that it will buy T-Mobile, the wireless industry goes from four major carriers to three. Does anyone care about antitrust laws anymore?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

With AT&T’s announcement that it will buy T-Mobile, the wireless industry goes from four major carriers to three. Does anyone care about antitrust and consumer protection laws anymore?

This past month AT&T announced plans to buy T-Mobile for $39 billion. The mega-merger will cut down the number of major wireless carriers from 4 to only 3, a consolidation of the market that doesn’t bode well for either those who rely on the industry for their livelihood or for customers. While cohorts of the wireless industry are urging Congress and the FCC not to use the merger as an excuse to create new regulations, others are beginning to wonder why even our existing antitrust and consumer protection laws don’t seem to apply anymore. On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, DC Editor Chris Hayes and journalist Barry C. Lynn track the historical trajectory of antitrust ideology in the US and discuss the legal antecedents and arguments that could be used to prevent further consolidation in major industries.

Further Reading:
Barry C. Lynn’s new book about the growing threat of monopoly capitalism, Cornered.
Barry C. Lynn and Phillip Longman on how monopolization is destroying jobs.
Annie Lowrey’s Slate article on why the AT&T merger is a bad idea.
Click here for a full transcript of this week’s episode of The Breakdown.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x