Beijing Basketball Watched By Billions

Beijing Basketball Watched By Billions

Beijing Basketball Watched By Billions

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

 

The most laudable part of the Summer Olympics is that it is one of the few times when the stifling sporting atmosphere in the United States actually opens up its window and lets in some air. For several glorious weeks, we turndown the volume on baseball, basketball and football–with a dash ofNASCAR–and get to glory in other athletic pursuits. We can consider thatswimmer Michael Phelps might be a better athlete than anyone in the NFL.We can debate whether Dara Torres, the 41-year-old swimmer whose firstOlympics was in 1984, is perhaps every bit the physical marvel that BrettFavre is. We can see Jamaica’s Usain Bolt and the US’s Tyson Gay race inthe 100 meters and reimagine speed. We can watch the Chinese womendivers and wonder how it’s possible for such tightly wound momentum toproduce such a small splash.

 

 

And with all this athletic and gender diversity on display, I am goingto write about men’s basketball. Yes, flagellate me with my ownhypocrisy as I retreat into the humid air of the mainstream, butSunday’s game between the US and China was historic and deserves its ownmention. It has been called the most watched basketball game in history,as more than a billion people tuned in to see the US defeat China 101-70. But the blowout score doesn’t begin to tell the story of the Chinese team, led by NBA All-Star Yao Ming, who kept the game close for about fifteen minutes. That is a remarkable accomplishment. Keep in mind, China practically didn’t have a team twenty years ago. They traveled to the states in 1986 and in an exhibition game against Division III Queens College, won by a whisker. Now they can compete with the greatest players in the world. The game also showed that the US still hasn’t learned to hitthree point shots in international play, which may damage them terriblyagainst Spain, Argentina, or my darkhorse pick, Greece, which doesn’t havea single NBA player but knows how to work the international game.

 

 

I wanted this to be the first post where I didn’t mention the ubiquitousjock-sniffing former cheerleader, George W. Bush, but alas he was at thegame as well. Bush even entered the team’s huddle and put in his handfor a "1-2-3, USA!" cheer. No word on whether ace point guard Chris Paulof the New Orleans Hornets, who has invested time and money inrebuilding the Big Easy, was able to keep down his lunch.

 

 

But while Bush taketh, he also giveth. In what can only be described asthe most apt photo possible, one that sums up his whole sorryadministration, Bush held up a flag where the stars and stripes werereversed. It’s been eight years of doing everything precisely wrong, a King Midas in reverse, where all he touches turns to dung. If I were on the US men’s hoops team, I’d be washing my hands with turpentine right about now.

 

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x