Back to the Future: Bush Administration Proposed Settling Displaced Palestinians in South America

Back to the Future: Bush Administration Proposed Settling Displaced Palestinians in South America

Back to the Future: Bush Administration Proposed Settling Displaced Palestinians in South America

Condoleezza Rice thought that Chile, or perhaps Argentina, could be a solution to Israel’s right-of-return problem.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

 Editor’s Note: With this post we welcome Greg Grandin, a frequent contributor to The Nation, to two weeks of guest-blogging on The Notion. Greg will be covering the Americas broadly, looking at Latino organizing, economic policies, and the conservative movement, and how US policy influences the region and vice versa.
 
The Guardian reports that Condoleezza Rice and the Bush Administration proposed, in a June 2008 Berlin meeting between Israelis and Palestinians, giving displaced Palestinians land in either Argentina or Chile. This apparently would serve as a solution to the “right-of-return” issue, that is, the demand by the millions of displaced Palestinians to return to their homes. The proposal was found among the recently leaked "Palestine Papers."

It is unclear if Rice ran the idea by Chileans or Argentines, but the idea invokes nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century schemes to solve conflicts caused by slavery, colonialism or nationalism by settling “problem” peoples on supposedly “vacant” lands. Liberia, for instance, was founded by the US in 1822 as a homeland for freed slaves. And then there’s Israel itself. It wasn’t specified what part of Chile Rice wanted to give to the Palestinians, though the country’s southern “frontier” has historically served as the second home of European migrants and refugees. But southern Chile is also the historic first home of the Mapuche people, who are currently waging a multi-year struggle to recover stolen land and political rights—not unlike Palestinians. And like the Palestinians, they suffer greatly at the hands of a state that invokes anti-terrorism laws (many of them dating back the Pinochet years, retrofitted for the “Global War on Terror”) to justify harsh prison terms and torture.   

At least Rice’s proposal was better than the one offered by Bush’s Pentagon undersecretary and neocon ultra, Douglas Feith, who immediately after 9/11 suggested, according to a memo cited by the 9/11 commission report, that the United States hold off invading Afghanistan and instead bomb the tri-border region joining Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay—home to a large community of migrants from Syria and Lebanon—just to "surprise" Al Qaeda and throw it off guard.  Liberia’s capital is called Monrovia, after the US president who founded it, James Monroe. Bushrovia anyone?  

Like this Blog Post? Read it on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x