Andrew Breitbart, Derrick Bell and the Attack on Black Intellectuals

Andrew Breitbart, Derrick Bell and the Attack on Black Intellectuals

Andrew Breitbart, Derrick Bell and the Attack on Black Intellectuals

Some political operatives are seeking to drive wedges between us by literally telling white America that Black intellectuals want them dead.


Some political operatives work hard to drive wedges between us. And since this nation elected its first black president, these operatives have worked feverishly to stoke fear in the hearts of white Americans. One way they have done this is by literally telling white America that black intellectuals want them dead.

I wish I were exaggerating.

In July 2010, Glenn Beck devoted a segment to Charles Ogletree, a black tenured Harvard professor whose many pupils included Obama. In the segment, Beck quoted Shamir Shabazz, a member of the New black Panther Party, who said that sometimes you have to “kill crackers.” Beck suggested that Ogletree, and by extension Obama, supported these views.

Any suggestion that killing someone because of their race, or even disliking them solely because of their race, is reprehensible. But neither Charles Ogletree nor any other prominent black intellectual I know would endorse any such statement.

In that same month, Andrew Breitbart, perhaps one of the most divisive figures in American political discourse, published a misleading video of Shirley Sherrod. Ms. Sherrod was forced to resign from her position at the Georgia State Rural Development Office of the US Department of Agriculture despite the fact that the allegations were untrue.

Last night, Andrew Breitbart (apparently from beyond the grave) was at it again. This time he and his cronies at released a video clip of a young Obama at Harvard law school hugging Professor Derrick Bell, a world renowned legal scholar and one of the foremost black intellectuals of his time, who passed away October 2011. Breitbart suggests that black people can’t be trusted to govern, by linking Obama to Bell.

This latest round of attack on black intellectuals should deeply trouble us all.

We have many big problems we need to address in this nation—saving our homes, finding jobs that support our families, plugging into new sources of energy. The way we solve them is to think, talk, debate and work to advance solutions. Sometimes we advance solutions by fighting about them. Professor Charles Ogletree and Professor Derrick Bell have been intellectual leaders in a long tradition of calling on America to address racial unfairness. Professor Ogletree asks the nation to question our incarceration of huge numbers of black and Latino men. Professor Bell mounted a peaceful demonstration at Harvard to protest the fact that two black faculty members were, in his view as a colleague of theirs, unfairly denied tenure.

So the Andrew Breitbarts and Glenn Becks of the world tell us that it is racist to talk about race and tell white people to fear for their lives if black people talk about race. This is a profound attack on our national values of dialogue and debate. It is also a perverse strategy to attack a black leader by association—President Obama.

We don’t have to agree on solutions to our problems or who is best positioned to lead us to them. But we must absolutely reject any suggestion that black intellectuals are dangerous because they are black intellectuals. Attacking the ability of black people to govern through specious claims that we are a danger to white people is nothing short of disgraceful.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy