And Liberally So

And Liberally So

The wordplay is the definition… literally!

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

In an &lit clue, the whole clue is the definition, and the whole clue is the wordplay. We follow US tradition and signal such clues with an exclamation point. We have written about these twice: Lit Parade and And the Lits Keep on Coming!.

Sometimes, of course, an exclamation point is just an exclamation point, and it signals nothing else, as in these examples:
   GASP  Cry out, “Gee, a snake!” (4)
   NOSFERATU  Vampire bats: “Fear us not!” (9)
   PERRY COMO  Singer with a pop record initially in Mexico—and how! (5,4)
   YOSEMITE  Hey, a Jew in a national park! (8)

In our puzzles, in perhaps 3/4 of the cases, the exclamation point does indicate an &lit clue. Here are the &lits from our third year as The Nation’s puzzlers:
   APTEST  It might reveal the most qualified! (2,4)
   CABARET  It consists of a bar, etc.! (7)
   CAPER  Prance about without a bit of nervousness! (5)
   CELL PHONE  Individual to hold this when talking! (4,5)
   DIET PEPSI  Deep sip? It is not very healthy! (4,5)
   EQUALITY  Justice’s ultimate character! (8)
   FIRST  Trees’ T! (5)
   GRAVITY’S RAINBOW  Experimental writing? Say “Bravo”! (8,7)
   HEALTHIER  Can make it haler, eh?! (9)
   HOOFPRINT  Thin proof after a stampede! (9)
   INSOLENCE Silence? No, misbehaving! (9)
   INSULT  It pains, ultimately, inside! (6)
   ISLE  Arrange leis here! (4)
   MINERAL  Aluminum found by one who goes underground, for example! (7)
   MOONLIGHT  Low luminescence, primarily found in darkness! (9)
   MOSH PIT  Most hip dancing?! (4,3)
   NUMBER ONE I!  (6,3)
   PREDATOR  Vicious raptor capturing energy with food, in the end! (8)
   ROGET  Where you find, e.g.: rot, corrupt! (5)
   ROPER  Vaquero, perhaps, at heart! (5)

   SEMAPHORE  Ultimately, communicate with a visual representation, perhaps

   received by shore! (9)
   SHORELINE  Herons lie all over the place! (9)
   SLANG  It’s “in” hipsters’ language! (5)

We believe that the solver’s extra satisfaction from an &lit clue gives the constructor permission to be a little less strict than usual when writing those clues. Thus you might find that one or two of the above definitions is a bit verbose or vague, and the wordplay in one or two clues is perhaps far-fetched or the indicator iffy. Some cryptic hardliners may have a problem with this liberal stance, but hey, we’re liberal.

Other cryptic hardliners object to &lit clues based on initials or last letters, as those are easier to construct:
   NASH  Ogden—a humorous wordsmith, ultimately! (4)
   WICCA  Wherein individual covens could affiliate, primarily! (5)
   YETI  Origins of yarn: “Everest’s terrifying iceman!” (4)

While we admit that these are not as impressive constructions as some others, we like them anyway, because we think they are fun to solve.

One last example—we liked this very concise charade &lit:
   POETS  Bards! (5)
But our test solvers felt it was too hard, so we ended up with this one:
   POETS  A couple of bards! (5)

Should we have stuck to our original idea?

This week’s cluing challenge: VERBATIM. To comment (and see other readers’ comments), please click on this post’s title and scroll to the bottom of the resulting screen. And now, four links:
• The current puzzle
• Our puzzle-solving guidelines | PDF
• Our e-books (solve past puzzles on your iOS device—many hints provided by the software!)
• A Nation puzzle solver’s blog where every one of our clues is explained in detail. This is also where you can post quibbles, questions, kudos or complaints about the current puzzle, as well as ask for hints.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x