An Alternative to Austerity

An Alternative to Austerity

In the looming debt-ceiling fight, progressives must make the case for protecting social programs, raising revenues and cutting the Pentagon budget.


Reuters/Mark Blinch 

After accepting a mini-bargain that includes tax hikes for Americans making more than $400,000 a year, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell announced: “The tax issue is finished, over, completed.” By shutting down debate on revenues while holding the line on the debt ceiling, McConnell and the GOP hope to turn their defeat in the fiscal cliff fight into a victory for austerity in the debt ceiling and sequester battles ahead. If they prevail, Social Security and Medicare benefits could end up back on the chopping block, and other cuts to government programs could trigger a “lost decade” of American economic decline.

It is impossible to negotiate with this position; it would be terrific if President Obama took Nancy Pelosi’s advice and simply raised the debt ceiling by invoking the Fourteenth Amendment’s charge to maintain the “validity of the public debt of the United States.” But Obama doesn’t want to go there, and so it falls to progressives to develop smart, aggressive alternatives to the GOP agenda. With House Republicans in disarray, there’s an opening for progressives to lay out a set of principles along the lines proposed by Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chair Keith Ellison: (1) reject the fiscal hostage-taking that would demand deep cuts to entitlement programs or discretionary spending in return for raising the debt ceiling; (2) protect Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security; (3) focus on Pentagon cuts and new revenues, to address deficit concerns while preserving enough flexibility to make investments in America’s top priority—new jobs.

These principles must be underpinned with specifics about where to find new revenues. It’s not hard. Former Senate Budget Committee chair Kent Conrad says the government loses $1.2 trillion annually because of tax breaks—some of them valid but many others gross giveaways to the wealthy and corporations. Pelosi has expressed interest in closing these loopholes. But that alone won’t be enough to protect working Americans from austerity. As Senator Bernie Sanders has argued, it’s time to start taxing capital gains—income “earned” from wealth—at the same rate as income earned from work. Alaska Senator Mark Begich has a savvy proposal for raising the Social Security payroll tax cap in order to ensure that millionaires and billionaires pay their share. And Ellison, working with National Nurses United and other unions, is proposing a “Robin Hood tax” on financial speculation that could yield hundreds of billions in coming years.

These proposals won’t pass, however, unless GOP obstructionism in Congress is addressed. Democrats can strengthen their hand with filibuster reform, as proposed by Senators Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Tom Udall of New Mexico. But the real fight—the only fight that’s likely to tip the balance in the Republican-controlled House—will be fought outside Washington. Unions and activist groups have to seek out those House Republicans who voted to raise taxes on the rich and convince them that their political future lies in cooperating with the president. This should be part of a broad campaign to redefine the debate so that absurd fights over raising the debt ceiling are replaced with a clear vision for preserving essential programs, making smart cuts at the Pentagon rather than dumb cuts to Social Security, and implementing fair taxation. This is the agenda Americans endorsed on November 6. We hope President Obama will advance it aggressively. But we know the president will be more inclined to boldness if progressives outline a muscular program and fight for it.

Hear Nation writers George Zornick and Bryce Covert, Jamelle Bouie of The American Prospect and Pat Garofalo of in a a Nation Conversation on “Winners and Losers in Washington's Debt Deal.”

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy