Alabama Hostage Rescue: Using the Military at Home?

Alabama Hostage Rescue: Using the Military at Home?

Alabama Hostage Rescue: Using the Military at Home?

A slippery slope that ought to scare us all.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email


Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave the approval for active duty soldiers to conduct law enforcement. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh.)

The Pentagon yesterday opened the door a little further to direct military involvement in US domestic affairs.

According to CNN, the military was involved in helping to rescue an Alabama boy kidnapped by a lunatic.

Said CNN:

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta approved a request from the FBI for high-tech military detection equipment to assist in surveillance on the underground bunker in Alabama where a 5-year-old boy was held hostage, CNN has learned.… The military detection equipment was delivered on site, according to a military official, but it could not immediately be determined if the equipment was used before or during the rescue. Three Defense Department officials tell CNN that the equipment requested was similar to the technology used in war zones to detect buried explosives. Some small number of troops would have been needed to operate the equipment on-site.

So, what happened was: actual active-duty troops conducted law enforcement activities.

This is not the first time. Ever since the ominous creation of the Northern Command, a Colorado-based US military command whose mission is the United States, the Pentagon has inched ever closer to direct involvement in domestic affairs. During various crises, I learned during a visit to Northcom a few years ago, the command sends contingents of troops to events such as the Super Bowl or political conventions. And a while back, I wrote a piece for Rolling Stone on the Pentagon’s domestic spying program under George W. Bush.

The Alabama operation was “personally approved” by Leon Panetta, the secretary of defense, according to CNN.

What’s the difference between a hostage-taking by a crazy person and, say, a terrorist event such as the seizure of a shopping mall by supporters of Al Qaeda or some action by a right-wing militia? None, as far as I can see—except that the military would probably get far more deeply involved in an anti-terrorist action. But terrorism is a crime, not an act of war.

Lots of people, including the Cato Institute, have written about the militarization of the police. The CIA is deeply enmeshed with the New York City police department. Military-style drones are being used nationwide for surveillance and intelligence gathering.

This isn’t just a worry for tinfoil-hat-wearing right-wingers and NRA extremists who want to arm themselves with automatic weapons to fight government tyranny. This is a real threat that ought to worry everyone, especially civil libertarians.

Your support makes stories like this possible

From Minneapolis to Venezuela, from Gaza to Washington, DC, this is a time of staggering chaos, cruelty, and violence. 

Unlike other publications that parrot the views of authoritarians, billionaires, and corporations, The Nation publishes stories that hold the powerful to account and center the communities too often denied a voice in the national media—stories like the one you’ve just read.

Each day, our journalism cuts through lies and distortions, contextualizes the developments reshaping politics around the globe, and advances progressive ideas that oxygenate our movements and instigate change in the halls of power. 

This independent journalism is only possible with the support of our readers. If you want to see more urgent coverage like this, please donate to The Nation today.

Ad Policy
x