After Midterms, Top Reporters Stress GOP, Not Tea Party

After Midterms, Top Reporters Stress GOP, Not Tea Party

After Midterms, Top Reporters Stress GOP, Not Tea Party

New data reveals how top political reporters are framing the midterm results in recent questions and press conferences.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Elections have a way of setting agendas.
 
While the candidates elected last week will not actually wield power until January, the political world is already adopting the language of the midterms. 
 
That’s especially true for political reporters, who frame the questions thrown at the White House’s freshly shellacked podium.
 
To get a snapshot of the new language, The Nation counted up the most frequent words that reporters used in their questions during three major post-election sessions.
 
We used the day-after press conference with President Obama, a similar outing with press secretary Robert Gibbs, and a trio of Sunday talk shows—Meet The Press, State of the Union and Fox News Sunday.
 
Below is a snapshot of the New Change created through the website Wordle.
 

 
A few trends jump out here:
 
Down with GOP: Despite all the media coverage of the tea party, these reporters overwhelmingly frame the results as a partisan victory for Republicans, not a special triump for tea party Republicans. (It’s hard to even find "tea" in this mix—on the lower left.)

There is no focus on a single Republican leader. The GOP ran the election as a "referendum on Obama" and the economy, and these press questions suggest that line is sticking. There is no close-up for a top Republican, be it Boehner (a dot under the "Republicans" line), McConnell (tucked under "tea" and "question,") or Pawlenty (in the lower right corner between "big" and "next"). 
 
In media coverage about the midterms, of course, individual GOP candidates drew lots of attention. After Obama, four of the five top newsmakers in the campaign’s homestretch were Republicans, according to data from the Pew Research Center.  The initial reaction among Washington reporters, however, is not focused on GOP leaders. That could shift quickly as Boehner and Obama clash, or meet up for slurpee summits.

Shut it Down. Finally, on policy, these journalists clearly see the election results as catalyzing a challenge to Obama’s domestic spending priorities. The recurring battle words are spending, healthcare and cuts. Notably, however, "jobs" and "Social Security" barely register.


With research by Devon Bancroft.

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x