After McChrystal, Time to Change Course in Afghanistan

After McChrystal, Time to Change Course in Afghanistan

After McChrystal, Time to Change Course in Afghanistan

More than six months after the implementation of McChrystal’s strategy, it’s clear that the policies Obama endorsed in Afghanistan are failing on all fronts.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Editor’s Note: Each week we cross-post an excerpt of Katrina vanden Heuvel’s column at the WashingtonPost.com.

 

Gen. Stanley McChrystal has submitted his resignation. Or he’s been fired. In any case, it was time for him to go. His departure will help slow the increasing erosion in civil-military relations—aided by both political parties over the last 20 years—which has threatened civilian control of the military.

 

It also means we can now turn to a more fundamental exit debate: How do we change course and craft a responsible strategy to end the war in Afghanistan?

 

It is critical we have this debate. Here’s one good reason: McChrystal’s top aide believes this war is unwinnable. In the most important quote in Rolling Stones fascinating article, Maj. Gen. Bill Mayville argues that the only way we win in Afghanistan is to redefine failure as victory: "It’s not going to look like a win, smell like a win or taste like a win. This is going to end in an argument."

 

So, instead of redefining failure as victory, shouldn’t we be debating how to fundamentally change course?

 

Read the rest of Katrina’s column at WashingtonPost.com.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x