Obama Slaps Down Petraeus on Invading Pakistan

Obama Slaps Down Petraeus on Invading Pakistan

Obama Slaps Down Petraeus on Invading Pakistan

The military has floated plans to send Special Forces across the Afghan border into Pakistan’s tribal areas. Not gonna happen.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Not long ago, I reported here on one the worst trial balloons ever floated during the Obama administration, namely, the idea of sending US military forces across the border from Afghanistan into Pakistan in pursuit of the Taliban and its allies. When the idea, first reported by the New York Times, surfaced, it was clear that the military was pushing for it, and at the time I compared it to President Nixon’s decision to expand the Vietnam War into Cambodia.

Now, it appears that the administration has decided against that, although the military commanders in the field are still hot to trot into the wilds of Waziristan and environs.

According to the Washington Post’s Karen de Young, "President Obama and his top national security aides rejected proposals, made by some military commanders and intelligence officials who have lost patience with Pakistan, to allow US ground forces to conduct targeted raids against insurgent safe havens, officials said. They concluded that the United States can ill afford to threaten or further alienate a precarious, nuclear-armed country whose cooperation is essential to the administration on several fronts."

That’s exactly right: it would seriously destabilize that unfortunate country, already plagued by Islamist militants of various kinds, including ones like the fanatic who assassinated the secular governor of Punjab this week.

Another good sign, reports de Young—though we’ll see—is that "the administration also plans ‘redouble our efforts to look for political approaches’ to ending the war, including a recognition that Pakistan ‘must play an important role’ if not a dominant one, in reconciliation talks with the Taliban."

For Petraeus, for the military, and for the neoconservatives demanding all-out war, both of these decisions are defeats.

It isn’t clear what else will be included in the "new" US policy toward Pakistan, though de Young reports that when Vice President Biden visits Pakistan next week he’ll bring stepped up pledges by the United States of "military, intelligence and economic support." Personally, I’m in favor of bribing Pakistan with whatever it takes to coax them and their Taliban cats-paws to the bargaining table.

Become a Sustaining Donor This September

Between the reemergence of right-wing red-baiting and Donald Trump’s use of the chilling National Security Presidential Memorandum–7 to criminalize left political organizing, we’re seeing McCarthyism reborn before our eyes.

This assault on democracy cannot be ignored or wished away. Resisting it requires bravery in the face of threats and repression, a steadfast commitment to the truth, and the unwavering belief that we can—and will—overcome this darkness.

We must have an independent media that sets the record straight, unearths corruption and abuses of power, and advances a politics of justice and dignity for all if we’re to win this fight.

That’s why I’m writing to you today. This September, The Nation needs to add 100 monthly donors to sustain our progressive journalism. Your contribution makes the next investigative report, the next truth-speaking column, and the next pathbreaking essay all possible. 

I hope you’ll support our work with a recurring donation today. If you donate $10 or more a month, we’ll send you a brand new “Hands Off the Free Press!” sticker to recognise your commitment to our cause. Please, donate today. 

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x