Afghan Farce: ‘Taliban’ Talker Was Phony!

Afghan Farce: ‘Taliban’ Talker Was Phony!

Afghan Farce: ‘Taliban’ Talker Was Phony!

Talking is still the way out. But, as Casey Stengel said, can’t anyone here play this game?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Shades of Manucher Ghorbanifar!
 
Ghorbanifar, of course, was the legendary faker who pretended (during the hilariously misguided Iran/Contra affair in the mid-1980s) to be an Iranian intermediary or spy of some sort who could help release American hostages held in Lebanon, and who turned out to be a fraud, or an Israeli spy, or something or other—but who certainly wasn’t what he said he was.

Maybe the fake Taliban member who swindled President Karzai and General Petraeus earlier this year was Ghorbanifar! In a fake Taliban beard and turban! Or maybe, whoever he was, he’ll turn up in Los Angeles this week peddling a reality show to the producers of Sarah Palin’s Alaska. Or maybe he’s a stand-up comic in Quetta, Pakistan, who keeps Mullah Omar rolling in the aisles with his bon-mots about how stupid the Crusader-Zionist alliance is, and then one day said: "You know, Omar, I can make them look silly!"

He did.

In a stunning revelation that ought to be fatally embarrassing to the Obama administration and its "AfPak" task force—even now conducting the promised, year-end review of a bungled war—the Washington Post and the New York Times, along with the AP, report that person who carried out secret talks with Karzai, the Afghans, and the United States this past summer was a phony. Reports the AP:

A man leading the Taliban side of peace talks with the Afghan government was an impersonator, an Afghan close to the negotiations said Tuesday, an embarrassing revelation for Afghan officials who have promoted reconciliation efforts as the best chance for ending the war.

Adds the Times:

For months, the secret talks unfolding between Taliban and Afghan leaders to end the war appeared to be showing promise, if only because of the appearance of a certain insurgent leader at one end of the table: Mullah Akhtar Muhammad Mansour, one of the most senior commanders in the Taliban movement.

But now, it turns out, Mr. Mansour was apparently not Mr. Mansour at all. In an episode that could have been lifted from a spy novel, United States and Afghan officials now say the Afghan man was an impostor, and high-level discussions conducted with the assistance of NATO appear to have achieved little.

The Times quotes a Western diplomat: "And we gave him a lot of money."

Count me among the fooled. Of course, I relied on Petraeus et al., who said that NATO had helped fly important Taliban leaders to Kabul for talks. But for Petraeus, the tip off should have been the absurdly modest "demands" of the fake "Taliban leader." Instead of asking for a share of government power in Kabul and the withdrawal of US and NATO forces, the phony Mansour just asked "that the Taliban leadership be allowed to safely return to Afghanistan, that Taliban soldiers be offered jobs, and that prisoners be released." Umm, no.

The thing is, there’s no way out of Afghanistan short of talking with the Taliban. But, as I’ve noted repeatedly, that means engaging not just with some fly-by-night "intermediary," Ghorbanifar-style, but getting the core Taliban council and its Pakistani backers in the ISI, Pakistan’s intelligence service, involved. The worrying thing, even in the early reporting of the purported talks, was that Pakistan was being cut out—and that would never work.

Meanwhile, unless he wants to be a laughingstock, Obama has to fire everyone involved in this charade.

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x